» Articles » PMID: 35176032

Further Evidence for the Capacity of Mirror Self-recognition in Cleaner Fish and the Significance of Ecologically Relevant Marks

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 17
PMID 35176032
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An animal that tries to remove a mark from its body that is only visible when looking into a mirror displays the capacity for mirror self-recognition (MSR), which has been interpreted as evidence for self-awareness. Conservative interpretations of existing data conclude that convincing evidence for MSR is currently restricted to great apes. Here, we address proposed shortcomings of a previous study on MSR in the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus, by varying preexposure to mirrors and by marking individuals with different colors. We found that (1) 14/14 new individuals scraped their throat when a brown mark had been provisioned, but only in the presence of a mirror; (2) blue and green color marks did not elicit scraping; (3) intentionally injecting the mark deeper beneath the skin reliably elicited spontaneous scraping in the absence of a mirror; (4) mirror-naive individuals injected with a brown mark scraped their throat with lower probability and/or lower frequency compared to mirror-experienced individuals; (5) in contrast to the mirror images, seeing another fish with the same marking did not induce throat scraping; and (6) moving the mirror to another location did not elicit renewed aggression in mirror-experienced individuals. Taken together, these results increase our confidence that cleaner fish indeed pass the mark test, although only if it is presented in ecologically relevant contexts. Therefore, we reiterate the conclusion of the previous study that either self-awareness in animals or the validity of the mirror test needs to be revised.

Citing Articles

Wild recognition: conducting the mark test for mirror self-recognition on wild baboons.

Ahmad E, Reiderman H, Huchard E, Delaunay A, Roatti V, Cowlishaw G Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20241933.

PMID: 39837506 PMC: 11750390. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1933.


The ability of teleost fishes to recognize individual faces suggests an early evolutionary origin in vertebrates.

Kohda M, Sogawa S, Sowersby W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1497386.

PMID: 39664642 PMC: 11632839. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497386.


Cats are (almost) liquid!-Cats selectively rely on body size awareness when negotiating short openings.

Pongracz P iScience. 2024; 27(10):110799.

PMID: 39474081 PMC: 11519432. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110799.


EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.

Bertram M, Agerstrand M, Thore E, Allen J, Balshine S, Brand J Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):556-585.

PMID: 39394884 PMC: 11885694. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13154.


Cleaner fish with mirror self-recognition capacity precisely realize their body size based on their mental image.

Kobayashi T, Kohda M, Awata S, Bshary R, Sogawa S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20202.

PMID: 39261520 PMC: 11390716. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70138-7.


References
1.
Hotta T, Ueno K, Hataji Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K, Kohda M . Transitive inference in cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus). PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0237817. PMC: 7433877. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237817. View

2.
Plotnik J, de Waal F, Reiss D . Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(45):17053-7. PMC: 1636577. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608062103. View

3.
Morrison R, Reiss D . Precocious development of self-awareness in dolphins. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0189813. PMC: 5761843. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189813. View

4.
Brown C . Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Anim Cogn. 2014; 18(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0. View

5.
Binning S, Rey O, Wismer S, Triki Z, Glauser G, Soares M . Reputation management promotes strategic adjustment of service quality in cleaner wrasse. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):8425. PMC: 5566447. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07128-5. View