Assessing the Utility and Patient Satisfaction of Virtual Retina Clinics During COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview

Journal Clin Ophthalmol

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2022 Feb 17

PMID 35173410

Authors

Leire Juaristi

Cristina Irigoyen

Jaione Chapartegui

Ane Guibelalde

Javier Mar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore whether the virtual retina clinic (VRC) has been a useful and safe platform for monitoring retinal diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic and assessing patient satisfaction.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted for patients with stable retinal diseases in Donostia University Hospital's Ophthalmology Service during the pandemic. All patients were assessed in the VRC with optical coherence tomography of the macula and widefield retinography, plus visual field tests in hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screenings. The VRC´s effectiveness was evaluated with repeat blind assessments and patient satisfaction with an adapted SERVQUAL scale.

Results: The most common diseases were diabetic retinopathy (30.3%) and age-related macular degeneration (21.8%). Most patients (74%) were eligible to continue in the VRC, 19.3% were referred to face-to-face (F2F) appointments and 6.6% were discharged. Patients underwent repeat blind assessments in F2F appointments to monitor VRC performance in 23.7% of the cases. The sensitivity to detect disease progression was 100%. The specificity was 80.1%. The VRC took half the time. The patient overall satisfaction rating was 9.8/10.

Conclusion: The VRC, as an additional platform, supports F2F appointments. Almost three-quarters of patients could continue being safely seen in the VRC. The virtual approach decreases SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Patient satisfaction is very good.

Translational Relevance: The VRC enables us to attend patients safely with decreased SARS-CoV-2 exposure.

Citing Articles

Primary care optometry-based diabetic retinopathy review clinics - a new model of care and comparison with virtual diabetic retinopathy clinics.

Dorrian D, Al-Janabi A, Gallagher K Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(15):2999-3004.

PMID: 38951677 PMC: 11461958. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03211-0.

Teleophthalmology and retina: a review of current tools, pathways and services.

Than J, Sim P, Muttuvelu D, Ferraz D, Koh V, Kang S Int J Retina Vitreous. 2023; 9(1):76.

PMID: 38053188 PMC: 10699065. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-023-00502-8.

Virtual front door for new referrals from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme in England.

Wood H, Jacob S Eye (Lond). 2023; 38(6):1219-1220.

PMID: 38036607 PMC: 11009325. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02865-6.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Metabolic Control of Diabetic Patients in Diabetic Retinopathy and Its Screening.

Romero-Aroca P, Baget-Bernaldiz M, Sagarra R, Hervas E, Blasco R, Molina J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498696 PMC: 9737650. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237121.

References

Lee J, Manjunath V, Talks S . Expanding the role of medical retina virtual clinics using multimodal ultra-widefield and optical coherence tomography imaging. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018; 12:2337-2345. PMC: 6247971. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S181108. View

. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(5 Suppl):823-33. View

Piyasena M, Murthy G, Yip J, Gilbert C, Peto T, Gordon I . Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of detection of any level of diabetic retinopathy using digital retinal imaging. Syst Rev. 2018; 7(1):182. PMC: 6222985. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0846-y. View

Kortuem K, Fasler K, Charnley A, Khambati H, Fasolo S, Katz M . Implementation of medical retina virtual clinics in a tertiary eye care referral centre. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102(10):1391-1395. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311494. View

Vardy J, Jenkins P, Clark K, Chekroud M, Begbie K, Anthony I . Effect of a redesigned fracture management pathway and 'virtual' fracture clinic on ED performance. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(6):e005282. PMC: 4067811. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005282. View

Mohebifar R, Hasani H, Barikani A, Rafiei S . Evaluating Service Quality from Patients' Perceptions: Application of Importance-performance Analysis Method. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016; 7(4):233-8. PMC: 5014747. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2016.05.002. View

Akkara J, Kuriakose A . Commentary: Teleophthalmology and electronic medical records: Weighing the pros and cons of unavoidable progress. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020; 68(2):367-368. PMC: 7003609. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2082_19. View

Ravindran M, Segi A, Mohideen S, Allapitchai F, Rengappa R . Impact of teleophthalmology during COVID-19 lockdown in a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(3):714-718. PMC: 7942072. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2935_20. View

Kern C, Kortuem K, Hamilton R, Fasolo S, Cai Y, Balaskas K . Clinical Outcomes of a Hospital-Based Teleophthalmology Service: What Happens to Patients in a Virtual Clinic?. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019; 3(5):422-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.01.011. View

10.

Lindeke-Myers A, Zhao P, Meyer B, Liu E, Levine D, Bennett O . Patient Perceptions of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Risk and Association With Continuity of Ophthalmic Care. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021; 139(5):508-515. PMC: 7953331. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0114. View

11.

Jayaram P, Bhattacharyya R, Jenkins P, Anthony I, Rymaszewski L . A new "virtual" patient pathway for the management of radial head and neck fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(3):297-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.006. View

12.

Saleem S, Pasquale L, Sidoti P, Tsai J . Virtual Ophthalmology: Telemedicine in a COVID-19 Era. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; 216:237-242. PMC: 7191296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.04.029. View

13.

Akkara J, Kuriakose A . Commentary: Is it time for teleophthalmology, virtual glaucoma clinics and uberization of eye care?. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(3):719-720. PMC: 7942080. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3823_20. View

14.

Soliman A, Silva P, Aiello L, Sun J . Ultra-wide field retinal imaging in detection, classification, and management of diabetic retinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2012; 27(5-6):221-7. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2012.708812. View

15.

Patel S, Shi A, Wibbelsman T, Klufas M . Ultra-widefield retinal imaging: an update on recent advances. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020; 12:2515841419899495. PMC: 6971964. DOI: 10.1177/2515841419899495. View

16.

Bernaola-Sagardui I . Validation of the Barthel Index in the Spanish population. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018; 28(3):210-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.12.001. View

17.

Trikha S, MacGregor C, Jeffery M, Kirwan J . The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26(10):1288-94. PMC: 3470903. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.120. View

18.

Scanlon P . The English National Screening Programme for diabetic retinopathy 2003-2016. Acta Diabetol. 2017; 54(6):515-525. PMC: 5429356. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-017-0974-1. View

19.

Zhang W, Speare S, Churilov L, Thuy M, Donnan G, Bernhardt J . Stroke rehabilitation in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2013; 9(4):494-502. DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12029. View

20.

Silva P, Dela Cruz A, Ledesma M, van Hemert J, Radwan A, Cavallerano J . Diabetic Retinopathy Severity and Peripheral Lesions Are Associated with Nonperfusion on Ultrawide Field Angiography. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(12):2465-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.034. View