Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Hand Dexterity in Stroke Patients: a Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Feb 17

PMID 35173006

Authors

Lulwa Alabdulaali

Lydia Hickman

T David Punt

Ned Jenkinson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Hand dexterity is the ability to execute the skilful movements using the hand and fingers. It is commonly impaired poststroke resulting in a profound deterioration in the quality of life for patients with stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, which has gained a popularity as an adjunct therapy in recovering motor dysfunction poststroke. Promising results have been gained from applying tDCS in combination with motor rehabilitation, however, the outcome of tDCS on the upper limb motor function poststroke has been varied. Different results are potentially related to the discrepancy of the area of brain stimulation. Therefore, we aim to enhance the application of tDCS to improve its effectiveness in recovering hand dexterity through testing our hypothesis that stimulating the primary motor cortex could improve fine dexterity more than gross dexterity.

Methods And Analysis: This protocol has been reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL databases will be searched with no restriction in language and publication date. The selected studies will be randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of tDCS alone or in combination with motor rehabilitation in improving hand dexterity of patients with stroke with upper limb hemiparesis. The outcomes of interest are fine and gross hand dexterity measures. Two independent reviewers will assess the eligibility of the study, extract data and appraise the methodological quality. The data will be pooled in a meta-analysis if applicable or interpreted narratively. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the overall quality of evidence for the fine and gross dexterity measures.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study. The dissemination plan is to publish the results in a peer-review journal and presenting results in a conference.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021262186.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Wang C, Zhang H, Wang Y, Bian J J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(10):3000605241288843.

PMID: 39474766 PMC: 11529671. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241288843.

Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.

Stockbridge M, Bunker L, Hillis A Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022; 22(11):745-755.

PMID: 36181577 PMC: 9525934. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01231-5.

References

Hsieh Y, Wu C, Lin K, Chang Y, Chen C, Liu J . Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009; 40(4):1386-91. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530584. View

Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

Marquez J, van Vliet P, McElduff P, Lagopoulos J, Parsons M . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2013; 10(3):306-16. DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12169. View

Bolognini N, Vallar G, Casati C, Latif L, El-Nazer R, Williams J . Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25(9):819-29. DOI: 10.1177/1545968311411056. View

Stinear C, Lang C, Zeiler S, Byblow W . Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(4):348-360. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6. View

de Morton N . The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009; 55(2):129-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70043-1. View

Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu W, Gerloff C . Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 3):490-9. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh369. View

Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):557-60. PMC: 192859. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. View

Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster A, Wiesiolek C, Chagas A, Machado G . The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 38(7):653-60. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1055382. View

10.

Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou A, Jiang J, Adnan T . Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(5):641-661. PMC: 5007190. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. View

11.

Wu A, Fregni F, Simon D, Deblieck C, Pascual-Leone A . Noninvasive brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease and dystonia. Neurotherapeutics. 2008; 5(2):345-61. PMC: 3270324. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.02.002. View

12.

Kwakkel G, Kollen B, van der Grond J, Prevo A . Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34(9):2181-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD. View

13.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

14.

Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge J, Hughes A, Pickering R, Desikan M, Rothwell J . Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 127(1):946-955. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067. View

15.

Rocha L, Gama G, Rocha R, Rocha L, Dias C, Santos L . Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Increases Functionality and Quality of Life after Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021; 30(6):105774. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105774. View

16.

Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I, Di Bella P, Johnson G . Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa. View

17.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7647. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647. View

18.

Cunningham D, Varnerin N, Machado A, Bonnett C, Janini D, Roelle S . Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015; 33(6):911-26. PMC: 4732280. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150574. View

19.

Hummel F, Heise K, Celnik P, Floel A, Gerloff C, Cohen L . Facilitating skilled right hand motor function in older subjects by anodal polarization over the left primary motor cortex. Neurobiol Aging. 2009; 31(12):2160-8. PMC: 2995492. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.12.008. View

20.

Wolf S, Catlin P, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A . Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32(7):1635-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635. View