» Articles » PMID: 35169387

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 1 with Recommendations on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy

Abstract

This update of the interdisciplinary S3 guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL) was published in March 2021. This updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics ( , DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology ( , AGO) of the German Cancer Society ( , DKG). The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2014 was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or - if evidence was lacking - on a consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new recommendations or statements which took account of more recently published literature and the appraisal of the new evidence. The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, screening, diagnostic workup and therapy of patients with cervical cancer. The most important new aspects included in this updated guideline include the newly published FIGO classification of 2018, the radical open surgery approach for cervical cancers up to FIGO stage IB1, and use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.

Citing Articles

Quality assurance using quality indicators for prevention and early detection of cervical cancer in certified gynaecological dysplasia units and consultancies.

Steinkasserer L, Wesselmann S, Quaas J, Beckmann M, Dannecker C, Hachenberg J Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(4):2191-2202.

PMID: 39207473 PMC: 11393002. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07694-w.


Swin-GA-RF: genetic algorithm-based Swin Transformer and random forest for enhancing cervical cancer classification.

Alohali M, El-Rashidy N, Alaklabi S, Elmannai H, Alharbi S, Saleh H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1392301.

PMID: 39099689 PMC: 11294103. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392301.


ViT-PSO-SVM: Cervical Cancer Predication Based on Integrating Vision Transformer with Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine.

AlMohimeed A, Shehata M, El-Rashidy N, Mostafa S, Samy Talaat A, Saleh H Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39061811 PMC: 11273508. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070729.


Implementation of quality indicators for vulvar cancer in gynaecological cancer centres certified by the German Cancer Society (DKG).

Stuebs F, Beckmann M, Dannecker C, Follmann M, Nothacker M, Schnurch H J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(5):250.

PMID: 38727842 PMC: 11087317. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05769-4.


Impact of the Corona Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment.

Stuebs F, Behrens A, Seibold A, Adler W, Geppert C, Hartmann A In Vivo. 2024; 38(2):734-740.

PMID: 38418110 PMC: 10905465. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13495.


References
1.
Kasamatsu T, Onda T, Sawada M, Kato T, Ikeda S, Sasajima Y . Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 2009; 100(9):1400-5. PMC: 2694432. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605048. View

2.
Kang S, Kim S, Chung D, Seo S, Kim J, Nam B . Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET for evaluation of paraaortic nodal metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma: a metaanalysis. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51(3):360-7. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066217. View

3.
Choi H, Ju W, Myung S, Kim Y . Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010; 101(6):1471-9. PMC: 11159236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x. View

4.
Horn L, Hentschel B, Fischer U, Peter D, Bilek K . Detection of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri using step sectioning: Frequency, topographic distribution and prognostic impact. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111(2):276-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.017. View

5.
Lee Y, Kim D, Lee S, Park J, Suh D, Kim J . A postoperative scoring system for distant recurrence in node-positive cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection with para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 144(3):536-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.001. View