» Articles » PMID: 35168659

Influence of the Scleral Indentation Technique on the Re-detachment Rate Following Retinal Detachment Surgery

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35168659
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine whether the choice of scleral indentation technique during primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery has an influence on the risk of re-detachment.

Methods: We included retrospectively 154 eyes with a primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated in the Eye Clinic Sulzbach/Saar Germany, who were operated on by two experienced surgeons using the same basic surgical setup. Surgeon A performed an external 360° indentation, shaved the vitreous base using the light pipe cap, and used the operating microscope (opm) for direct visualization. Surgeon B performed an external 360° indentation, shaved the vitreous base using a simple indentor, and used an endoillumination (light pipe) with the opm and a handheld widefield lens for direct visualization.

Results: Comparing both indentation procedures, 15.66% (13/83) of patients operated on by surgeon A and 9.86% (7/71) of patients operated on by surgeon B had a retinal re-detachment within a follow-up period of 6 months (adj. p = 0.64, two-proportion Z-test).

Conclusion: The rate of retinal re-detachment could be influenced by the indentation technique at the end of surgery favoring external indentation and internal visualization with an endoilluminator (chandelier light). We attribute this to the better visualization of the vitreous base facilitated by endoillumination. However, many variables play a role in the development of retinal re-detachment, requiring further studies with a larger number of patients.

Citing Articles

The Role of Preoperative Case Selection in the Training of Surgical Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

William A, Kuehnel S, Dimopoulos S, Hillenkamp J, Goebel W Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:3113-3122.

PMID: 37881783 PMC: 10593965. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S425646.

References
1.
Vaziri K, Schwartz S, Kishor K, Flynn Jr H . Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:471-6. PMC: 4801126. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S98529. View

2.
Setlur V, Rayess N, Garg S, Hsu J, Luo C, Regillo C . Combined 23-Gauge PPV and Scleral Buckle Versus 23-Gauge PPV Alone for Primary Repair of Pseudophakic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015; 46(7):702-7. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20150730-03. View

3.
Eckardt C, Paulo E . HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2015; 36(1):137-47. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689. View

4.
Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Garcia-Arumi J . Pars plana vitrectomy alone with diffuse illumination and vitreous dissection to manage primary retinal detachment with unseen breaks. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(10):1297-304. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.254. View

5.
Wickham L, Connor M, Aylward G . Vitrectomy and gas for inferior break retinal detachments: are the results comparable to vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle?. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88(11):1376-9. PMC: 1772385. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.043687. View