» Articles » PMID: 35168657

Intervertebral-spreader-assisted Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Prevents Postoperative Axial Pain by Alleviating Facet Joint Pressure

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35168657
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relationship of postoperative cervical axial pain with different vertebral distraction methods used during ACDF procedures in cervical spondylosis patients.

Methods: Ninety-four single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with significantly loss of intervertebral disc height who underwent ACDF surgery in our institute between January 2018 and January 2020 were enrolled. Cervical spine lateral radiographs were taken preoperatively, 3 days, 1-month, 2-month and 6-month after the surgery. The intervertebral disc height (IDH), interfacet distance (IFD), JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score, NDI (Neck Disability Index) score, nVAS (Neck Visual Analogue Scale) score and aVAS (Arm Visual Analogue Scale) score were measured. The correlation of clinical parameters and intervertebral disc height was evaluated. Then the correlation of clinical outcomes and different distraction method was evaluated. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one uses Casper pin distractor system alone for distraction (Caspar alone group) and the other uses spreader assisted distraction method (Casper + spreader group). In biomechanical study, four cervical spine cadavers were selected for facet pressure measurements under different vertebral distraction methods, and the facet joint pressure was measured using force sensors.

Results: Satisfactory cervical fusion and neurological recovery were achieved in all patients. No significant correlation of IDH, IFD, JOA, NDI or aVAS with nVAS score was found. No significant difference between the change in disc height and clinical outcomes was found. However, by comparing the clinical parameters of patients in different vertebral distraction groups, we found significant changes in the early nVAS and NDI scores (P = 0.11, P = 0.48) of the Casper + spreader group (3 days postoperation), and was associated with a better nVAS score at 2 months postoperation (P < 0.05). The biomechanical study in cervical cadavers also showed significantly and continuously decreased facet joint pressure in the spreader assisted vertebral distraction group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Spreader-assisted vertebral distraction method effectively alleviates postoperative neck pain in degenerative cervical spondylosis patients treated with ACDF. The mechanism may be related to the transient relief of facet joint pressure during the vertebral distraction procedure in ACDF.

Citing Articles

Construction of a nomogram for predicting the prognosis of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

Ling H, Deng G, Xia S, Li W, Lu R, Lin M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31919.

PMID: 39738373 PMC: 11685574. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83429-w.


Correlation between axial symptoms and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with two-level or three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervcial discectomy and fusion versus hybird surgery.

Qiu Z, Xiong Y, Yu X, Li W, Ma Y, Feng N Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(8):3017-3026.

PMID: 38795150 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08316-4.


[Analysis of imaging characteristics and effectiveness of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis].

Lu H, Yu H, Zhang W, Chai Z, Ge X, Zhao R Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(5):542-549.

PMID: 38752239 PMC: 11096889. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402018.


A Novel Intraoperative Posture-Adjustment Apparatus for Correction of Cervical Lordosis in Anterior Cervical Surgery.

Deng Y, Wang B, Liu H, Meng Y, Rong X, Wu T Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(12):3162-3173.

PMID: 37866365 PMC: 10694009. DOI: 10.1111/os.13917.


Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs. anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in local kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Du W, Wang H, Lv J, Wang S, Shen Y, Zhang X Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e19106.

PMID: 37636480 PMC: 10450976. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19106.


References
1.
Anderson P, Sasso R, Hipp J, Norvell D, Raich A, Hashimoto R . Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(22 Suppl):S85-95. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628. View

2.
Chang U, Kim D, Lee M, Willenberg R, Kim S, Lim J . Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7(1):33-9. DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/07/033. View

3.
Cavanaugh J, Lu Y, Chen C, Kallakuri S . Pain generation in lumbar and cervical facet joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88 Suppl 2:63-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01411. View

4.
Yifei G, Xiaolong S, Yang L, Peng C, Wen Y . Clinical outcomes of anterior correction and reconstruction for neurofibromatosis-associated severe cervical kyphotic deformity. Int Orthop. 2018; 43(3):639-646. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4050-4. View

5.
Zhou J, Li L, Li T, Xue Y . Preoperative Modic changes are related to axial symptoms after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Pain Res. 2018; 11:2617-2623. PMC: 6209067. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S172953. View