» Articles » PMID: 35168622

Barriers to Recruitment into Emergency Department-initiated Palliative Care: a Sub-study of a Multi-site, Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35168622
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) visits among older adults are common near the end of life. Palliative care has been shown to reduce ED visits and to increase quality of life among patients, but recruitment into these programs is often challenging. This descriptive analysis explores the barriers to enrolling seriously ill patients scheduled for discharge from the ED into palliative care research.

Methods: This descriptive sub-study aims to assess the reasons why patients with advanced illness scheduled for discharge home from 11 EDs across the United States decline to participate in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA), a Phase IV randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two modes of palliative care delivery. Our aim was to understand why patients decline to enroll to improve future recruitment rates and expand care for patients discharged home from the ED. Research coordinators documented reasons that patients declined to enroll in the larger EMPallA trial; reasons for refusing participation were independently analyzed by two researchers to identify overarching themes.

Results: Enrollment rate across all sites was 45%; of the 504 eligible patients who declined participation, 47% (n = 237) declined for reasons related to illness severity. 28% of refusals (n = 143) were related to the mode of palliative care delivery, while 24% (n = 123) were due to misconceptions or stigma related to palliative care. Less commonly, patients refused due to general research barriers (16.5%), family/caregiver barriers (11.7%), and physician-related barriers (< 1%).

Conclusions: Patients with advanced illnesses presenting to the ED often refuse to participate in palliative care research due to the severity of their illness, the mode of care delivery, and misconceptions about palliative care. In contrast with other studies, our study found minimal physician gatekeeping, which may be the result of both changing attitudes toward palliative care and the nature of the ED setting. Robust training programs are crucial to overcome these misconceptions and to educate patients and providers about the role of palliative care. Future palliative care programs and study designs should recognize the burden this vulnerable population endures and consider alternative modes of care delivery in an effort to increase participation and enrollment.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03325985 , October 30, 2017.

Citing Articles

Understanding barriers and facilitators to palliative and end-of-life care research: a mixed method study of generalist and specialist health, social care, and research professionals.

Walshe C, Dunleavy L, Preston N, Payne S, Ellershaw J, Taylor V BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):159.

PMID: 38918771 PMC: 11202245. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01488-2.


Serious illness communication skills training for emergency physicians and advanced practice providers: a multi-method assessment of the reach and effectiveness of the intervention.

Adeyemi O, Ginsburg A, Kaur R, Cuthel A, Zhao N, Siman N BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):48.

PMID: 38378532 PMC: 10880358. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01349-y.


Serious Illness Communication Skills Training for Emergency Physicians and Advanced Practice Providers: A Multi-Method Assessment of the Reach and Effectiveness of the Intervention.

Adeyemi O, Ginsburg A, Kaur R, Cuthel A, Zhao N, Siman N Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 36865121 PMC: 9980220. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2561749/v1.

References
1.
Brumley R, Enguidanos S, Cherin D . Effectiveness of a home-based palliative care program for end-of-life. J Palliat Med. 2003; 6(5):715-24. DOI: 10.1089/109662103322515220. View

2.
Riegel B, Carlson B, Kopp Z, Lepetri B, Glaser D, Unger A . Effect of a standardized nurse case-management telephone intervention on resource use in patients with chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(6):705-12. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.705. View

3.
Cheung N, Gorelik A, Mehta P, Mudannayake L, Ramesh A, Bharathan T . Perception of palliative medicine by health care professionals at a teaching community hospital: what is the key to a "palliative attitude"?. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019; 12:437-443. PMC: 6557117. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S182356. View

4.
Rinck G, van den Bos G, Kleijnen J, de Haes H, Schade E, Veenhof C . Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15(4):1697-707. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1697. View

5.
Hanratty B, Hibbert D, Mair F, May C, Ward C, Corcoran G . Doctors' understanding of palliative care. Palliat Med. 2006; 20(5):493-7. DOI: 10.1191/0269216306pm1162oa. View