» Articles » PMID: 35168310

A Study on Verification of Equivalence and Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacologic Dementia Prevention and Early Detection Contents : Non-Randomly Equivalent Design

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35168310
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to verify the equivalence and effectiveness of the tablet-administered Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (K-RBANS) for the prevention and early detection of dementia.

Methods: Data from 88 psychiatry and neurology patient samples were examined to evaluate the equivalence between tablet and paper administrations of the K-RBANS using a non-randomly equivalent group design. We calculated the prediction scores of the tablet-administered K-RBANS based on demographics and covariate-test scores for focal tests using norm samples and tested format effects. In addition, we compared the receiver operating characteristic curves to confirm the effectiveness of the K-RBANS for preventing and detecting dementia.

Results: In the analysis of raw scores, line orientation showed a significant difference (t=-2.94, p<0.001), and subtests showed small to large effect sizes (0.04-0.86) between paper- and tablet-administered K-RBANS. To investigate the format effect, we compared the predicted scaled scores of the tablet sample to the scaled scores of the norm sample. Consequently, a small effect size (d≤0.20) was observed in most of the subtests, except word list and story recall, which showed a medium effect size (d=0.21), while picture naming and subtests of delayed memory showed significant differences in the one-sample t-test. In addition, the area under the curve of the total scale index (TSI) (0.827; 95% confidence interval, 0.738-0.916) was higher than that of the five indices, ranging from 0.688 to 0.820. The sensitivity and specificity of TSI were 80% and 76%, respectively.

Conclusion: The overall results of this study suggest that the tablet-administered K-RBANS showed significant equivalence to the norm sample, although some subtests showed format effects, and it may be used as a valid tool for the brief screening of patients with neuropsychological disorders in Korea.

References
1.
Daniel M, Wahlstrom D . Raw-score equivalence of computer-assisted and paper versions of WISC-V. Psychol Serv. 2018; 16(2):213-220. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000295. View

2.
Anowar M, McGrath C, Saub R . Measurement Equivalence of "Touch-Screen" versus "Paper-Based" Assessments of OHRQoL: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020; 12:199-204. PMC: 7269662. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S248429. View

3.
Wada-Isoe K, Kikuchi T, Umeda-Kameyama Y, Mori T, Akishita M, Nakamura Y . Global Clinical Dementia Rating Score of 0.5 May Not Be an Accurate Criterion to Identify Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2019; 3(1):233-239. PMC: 6839533. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-190126. View

4.
Park J, Koo B, Kim J, Bai D, Chang M, Kim O . The Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status-Update : Psychiatric and Neurosurgery Patient Sample Validity. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020; 64(1):125-135. PMC: 7819793. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0090. View

5.
Lee J, Lee K, Lee D, Kim K, Jhoo J, Kim J . Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(1):P47-53. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p47. View