» Articles » PMID: 35167615

Psychosocial Outcome and Health Behaviour Intent of Breast Cancer Patients with BRCA1/2 and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants Unselected by a Priori Risk

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35167615
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is an increasing number of cancer patients undertaking treatment-focused genetic testing despite not having a strong family history or high a priori risk of being carriers because of the decreasing cost of genetic testing and development of new therapies. There are limited studies on the psychosocial outcome of a positive result among breast cancer patients who are at low a priori risk, particularly in women of Asian descent. Breast cancer patients enrolled under the Malaysian Breast Cancer Genetic Study between October 2002 and February 2018 were tested for BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 genes. All 104 carriers identified were invited by a research genetic counsellor for result disclosure. Of the 104 carriers, 64% (N = 66) had low a priori risk as determined by PENN II scores. Psychosocial, risk perception and health behaviour measures survey were conducted at baseline (pre-result disclosure), and at two to six weeks after result disclosure. At baseline, younger carriers with high a priori risk had higher Cancer Worry Scale scores than those with low a priori risk but all scores were within acceptable range. Around 75% and 55% of high a priori risk carriers as well as 80% and 67% of low a priori risk carriers had problems in the "living with cancer" and "children" psychosocial domains respectively. All carriers regardless of their a priori risk demonstrated an improved risk perception that also positively influenced their intent to undergo risk management procedures. This study has shown that with sufficient counselling and support, low a priori risk carriers are able to cope psychologically, have improved perceived risk and increased intent for positive health behaviour despite having less anticipation from a family history prior to knowing their germline carrier status.

References
1.
Hamilton J, Lobel M, Moyer A . Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 2009; 28(4):510-8. PMC: 2807362. DOI: 10.1037/a0014778. View

2.
Owens D, Davidson K, Krist A, Barry M, Cabana M, Caughey A . Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2019; 322(7):652-665. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987. View

3.
Panchal S, Ennis M, Canon S, Bordeleau L . Selecting a BRCA risk assessment model for use in a familial cancer clinic. BMC Med Genet. 2008; 9:116. PMC: 2630980. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-116. View

4.
Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J, Gonzalez-Neira A, Luccarini C, Wahlstrom C . Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(5):428-439. PMC: 7611105. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. View

5.
Haber G, Ahmed N, Pekovic V . Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(12):2322-9. PMC: 3519312. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300786. View