» Articles » PMID: 35162743

Supporting Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment Skills: A Case Study of Five Companies

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Financial burden due to poor occupational safety practices remains high although occupational health and safety (OHS) have improved in recent years. Conducting risk assessment is one way to improve OHS. Workplaces may not have sufficient expertise in risk assessment. The aim of this study was to identify the needed OHS risk assessment skills, current support in the workplaces and the ways to improve risk assessment skills. This study was conducted with the Delphi survey for OHS experts ( = 13) and with interviews ( = 41) in the case companies. OHS experts agreed that the most significant skills were for employees to identify hazards and minimize risks in one's work; for supervisors to influence others with a good example; and for OHS experts to understand and manage the wholeness of safety practices and understand and manage the meaning, concepts, and criteria of risk assessment. The current main support methods were learning at work, training and written instructions. However, many of the interviewees felt that they had not received risk assessment training and that the support depended on their activity. Finally, the OHS experts determined that the most feasible ways to improve risk assessment skills were training, coaching and giving clear instructions. Likewise, the interviewees suggested various training methods. Based on these results, concrete development plans to improve risk assessment skills can be made.

Citing Articles

Improvements in protective measures in factories with acetylene hydrochlorination and ethylene oxychlorination techniques declined risk assessment levels and affected liver health status.

Dong Y, Wang X, Hu W, Bian H, Wang X, Kang N Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1053300.

PMID: 36483242 PMC: 9723347. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1053300.

References
1.
Pokryszko-Dragan A, Marschollek K, Nowakowska-Kotas M, Aitken G . What can we learn from the online learning experiences of medical students in Poland during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?. BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):450. PMC: 8390042. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02884-5. View

2.
Burke M, Salvador R, Smith-Crowe K, Chan-Serafin S, Smith A, Sonesh S . The dread factor: how hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 96(1):46-70. DOI: 10.1037/a0021838. View

3.
Brahm F, Singer M . Is more engaging safety training always better in reducing accidents? Evidence of self-selection from Chilean panel data. J Safety Res. 2013; 47:85-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.09.003. View

4.
Aven T, Zio E . Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Anal. 2013; 34(7):1164-72. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12132. View

5.
Taylor M, Wirth O, Olvina M, Alvero A . Experimental analysis of using examples and non-examples in safety training. J Safety Res. 2016; 59:97-104. PMC: 5131726. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.002. View