» Articles » PMID: 35162673

Social Bots' Involvement in the COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions on Twitter

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media served as an important channel for the public to obtain health information and disseminate opinions when offline communication was severely hindered. Yet the emergence of social bots influencing social media conversations about public health threats will require researchers and practitioners to develop new communication strategies considering their influence. So far, little is known as to what extent social bots have been involved in COVID-19 vaccine-related discussions and debates on social media. This work selected a period of nearly 9 months after the approval of the first COVID-19 vaccines to detect social bots and performed high-frequency word analysis for both social bot-generated and human-generated tweets, thus working out the extent to which social bots participated in the discussion on the COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter and their participation features. Then, a textual analysis was performed on the content of tweets. The findings revealed that 8.87% of the users were social bots, with 11% of tweets in the corpus. Besides, social bots remained active over three periods. High-frequency words in the discussions of social bots and human users on vaccine topics were similar within the three peaks of discourse.

Citing Articles

A game theoretic complex network model to estimate the epidemic threshold under individual vaccination behaviour and adaptive social connections.

Kumar V, Bauch C, Bhattacharyya S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29148.

PMID: 39587142 PMC: 11589594. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79771-8.


Extracting factors associated with vaccination from Twitter data and mapping to behavioral models.

Biswas M, Shah Z Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023; 19(3):2281729.

PMID: 38013461 PMC: 10760324. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2281729.


Examining the Negative Sentiments Related to Influenza Vaccination from 2017 to 2022: An Unsupervised Deep Learning Analysis of 261,613 Twitter Posts.

Ng Q, Lee D, Ng C, Yau C, Lim Y, Liew T Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37376407 PMC: 10305179. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061018.


Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021.

Sohi M, Pitesky M, Gendreau J GM Crops Food. 2023; 14(1):1-9.

PMID: 36947744 PMC: 10038016. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294.


Social Bots' Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion on Twitter.

Zhang Y, Song W, Shao J, Abbas M, Zhang J, Koura Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36833983 PMC: 9967279. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043284.


References
1.
Betsch C, Brewer N, Brocard P, Davies P, Gaissmaier W, Haase N . Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine. 2012; 30(25):3727-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025. View

2.
Hussain A, Tahir A, Hussain Z, Sheikh Z, Gogate M, Dashtipour K . Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(4):e26627. PMC: 8023383. DOI: 10.2196/26627. View

3.
Shao C, Ciampaglia G, Varol O, Yang K, Flammini A, Menczer F . The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4787. PMC: 6246561. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7. View

4.
Dixon G, Clarke C . The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Educ Res. 2012; 28(2):352-9. DOI: 10.1093/her/cys110. View

5.
Blankenship E, Goff M, Yin J, Tse Z, Fu K, Liang H . Sentiment, Contents, and Retweets: A Study of Two Vaccine-Related Twitter Datasets. Perm J. 2018; 22:17-138. PMC: 6004971. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/17-138. View