Sociodemographic Determinants of Poles' Attitudes Towards the Forest During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2022 Feb 15

PMID 35162559

Authors

Anna Koprowicz

Robert Korzeniewicz

Wojciech Pusz

Marlena Baranowska

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Attitudes towards forest ecosystems have been changing together with human needs, which is amplified with society's increasing need to spend recreation time in the forest. The phenomenon has been particularly visible during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the attitude of Poles to forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research was based on (1) a sociodemographic background questionnaire that consisted of questions about the independent variables and (2) the LAS scale-an independently prepared tool for measuring attitudes towards the forest. In the survey, 1025 people participated (673 women). The age of the subjects was between 19 and 68. The attitude towards the forest was analysed in three dimensions: Benefits, Involvement, and Fears. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks were used for statistical analysis. Women and people with primary education expressed the most fears connected with going to the forest. Men and people living in the countryside and in small towns, as well as respondents who were professionally active and performing work connected with forests were the most involved in exploring the forest and working for its benefit. Concerning the forest, concerned women, people from the highest age group, respondents with university education, and white-collar workers notice the most benefits from recreational activities in the forest.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Effects of Mountain Hiking vs. Forest Therapy on Physical and Mental Health of Couples: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Huber D, Freidl J, Pichler C, Bischof M, Kiem M, Weisbock-Erdheim R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36674227 PMC: 9859399. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021469.

Civil society's perception of forest ecosystem services. A case study in the Western Alps.

Bruzzese S, Blanc S, Merlino V, Massaglia S, Brun F Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1000043.

PMID: 36275258 PMC: 9586207. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000043.

References

Derks J, Giessen L, Winkel G . COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. For Policy Econ. 2020; 118:102253. PMC: 7355319. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253. View

Tyrvainen L, Ojala A, Neuvonen M, Borodulin K, Lanki T . [Health and well-being from forests - experience from Finnish research]. Sante Publique. 2019; S1(HS):249-256. DOI: 10.3917/spub.190.0249. View

Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H . Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35:207-28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443. View

Grima N, Corcoran W, Hill-James C, Langton B, Sommer H, Fisher B . The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243344. PMC: 7746267. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243344. View

Karjalainen E, Sarjala T, Raitio H . Promoting human health through forests: overview and major challenges. Environ Health Prev Med. 2009; 15(1):1-8. PMC: 2793342. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-008-0069-2. View

Aydin L, Bakirci S . Geographical distribution of ticks in Turkey. Parasitol Res. 2007; 101 Suppl 2:S163-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-007-0694-5. View

Daniel T, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd J, Chan K . Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(23):8812-9. PMC: 3384142. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109. View

Jeon J, Kim I, Yeon P, Shin W . The Physio-Psychological Effect of Forest Therapy Programs on Juvenile Probationers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10). PMC: 8161195. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105467. View

Aggestam F, Konczal A, Sotirov M, Wallin I, Paillet Y, Spinelli R . Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe. J Environ Manage. 2020; 268:110670. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110670. View

10.

Milligan C, Bingley A . Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health Place. 2007; 13(4):799-811. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.01.005. View

11.

Song C, Ikei H, Lee J, Park B, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y . Individual differences in the physiological effects of forest therapy based on Type A and Type B behavior patterns. J Physiol Anthropol. 2013; 32:14. PMC: 3851594. DOI: 10.1186/1880-6805-32-14. View

12.

OBrien L, Morris J, Stewart A . Engaging with peri-urban woodlands in England: the contribution to people's health and well-being and implications for future management. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(6):6171-92. PMC: 4078573. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110606171. View

13.

Bielinis E, Jaroszewska A, Lukowski A, Takayama N . The Effects of a Forest Therapy Programme on Mental Hospital Patients with Affective and Psychotic Disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 17(1). PMC: 6982075. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010118. View

14.

Grilli G, Sacchelli S . Health Benefits Derived from Forest: A Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(17). PMC: 7504269. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176125. View

15.

Ochiai H, Ikei H, Song C, Kobayashi M, Takamatsu A, Miura T . Physiological and psychological effects of forest therapy on middle-aged males with high-normal blood pressure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(3):2532-42. PMC: 4377916. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120302532. View

16.

Hawkley L, Thisted R, Masi C, Cacioppo J . Loneliness predicts increased blood pressure: 5-year cross-lagged analyses in middle-aged and older adults. Psychol Aging. 2010; 25(1):132-41. PMC: 2841310. DOI: 10.1037/a0017805. View

17.

Li Q, Morimoto K, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Hirata Y . Visiting a forest, but not a city, increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008; 21(1):117-27. DOI: 10.1177/039463200802100113. View

18.

Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai Y . Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: Shinrin-yoku (forest-air bathing, walking) as a possible method of stress reduction. Public Health. 2006; 121(1):54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.024. View

19.

Kim J, Shin W . Forest Therapy Alone or with a Guide: Is There a Difference between Self-Guided Forest Therapy and Guided Forest Therapy Programs?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(13). PMC: 8296901. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136957. View

20.

Tsunetsugu Y, Park B, Miyazaki Y . Trends in research related to "Shinrin-yoku" (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environ Health Prev Med. 2009; 15(1):27-37. PMC: 2793347. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-009-0091-z. View