» Articles » PMID: 35162481

In Vitro Study to Assess Effective Cleaning Techniques for Removing from Menstrual Cups

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162481
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We sought to determine the effectiveness of common cleaning procedures in eliminating from silicone menstrual cups.

Methods: In this in vitro study, we tested four cleaning techniques: (1) cold water; (2) cold water and liquid soap; (3) cold water followed by steeping the cup in boiled water for 5 min in a ceramic mug covered with a small plate; and (4) cold water and soap followed by steeping the cup in boiled water as in (3). Human blood was coated to the inner and outer surface of each cup, dried, and incubated with 10 colony-forming units (CFU/mL). All tests were performed in triplicate. Viable bacterial abundance was measured with decadic dilution and drop plate or surface plating.

Results: Bacteria were most effectively eliminated by cleaning cups with soap and water and then steeping in boiled water (0 CFU/cup vs. 2.075 × 10/cup no cleaning, = 0.005). This was not statistically significantly different from washing cups with water only and steeping 5 min in boiled water (14 CFU/cup). Raised lettering on the outer surface of the menstrual cups resulted in more bacterial recovery from pieces with lettering than without lettering.

Conclusions: These results advance knowledge of between-period menstrual cup cleaning recommendations, suggesting that the logistical challenges of continuous boiling may be eliminated with steeping at least 5 min.

Citing Articles

Development of methods to model the impact of vaginal lactobacilli on biofilm formation on menstrual cups as well as validation of recommended cleaning directions.

Friberg M, Woeller K, Iberi V, Mancheno P, Riedeman J, Bohman L Front Reprod Health. 2023; 5:1162746.

PMID: 37671283 PMC: 10475951. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1162746.

References
1.
van Eijk A, Zulaika G, Lenchner M, Mason L, Sivakami M, Nyothach E . Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2019; 4(8):e376-e393. PMC: 6669309. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2. View

2.
Beksinska M, Nkosi P, Zulu B, Smit J . Acceptability of the menstrual cup among students in further education institutions in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020; 26(1):11-16. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1815005. View

3.
Sommer M, Caruso B, Sahin M, Calderon T, Cavill S, Mahon T . A Time for Global Action: Addressing Girls' Menstrual Hygiene Management Needs in Schools. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(2):e1001962. PMC: 4764363. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001962. View

4.
Schlievert P . Effect of non-absorbent intravaginal menstrual/contraceptive products on Staphylococcus aureus and production of the superantigen TSST-1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019; 39(1):31-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03685-x. View

5.
Motta T, Lagana A, Valenti G, La Rosa V, Noventa M, Vitagliano A . [Differential diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding in adolescence]. Minerva Ginecol. 2017; 69(6):618-630. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04090-4. View