» Articles » PMID: 35162278

Relationships Between Agile Work Practices and Occupational Well-Being: The Role of Job Demands and Resources

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162278
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Agile work practices have been adopted by most software development organizations and by many large organizations from other industries. The introduction of agile work practices is assumed to positively affect work characteristics and, in turn, well-being of employees. So far, there is only very little and methodologically limited empirical research on this topic. Based on job demands-resources theory, we developed and tested a model on the direct and indirect relationships between agile work practices, job demands and resources, and occupational well-being. Data were provided by 260 employees working in agile development teams who participated in two surveys that were approximately six weeks apart. Results of structural equation modeling provided support for the hypothesized model, suggesting that agile work practices have a negative indirect effect on emotional fatigue through lower job demands. At the same time, agile work practices also had a positive indirect effect on emotional engagement through higher job resources. Our research contributes to the literature by integrating agile work practices with job demands-resources theory, bridging an important gap between research and practice. Overall, the findings suggest that the implementation of agile work practices may have a positive impact on occupational well-being by improving employees' perceptions of key work characteristics.

Citing Articles

Effects of organizational climate on employee job satisfaction and psychological well-being: the role of technological influence in Chinese higher education.

Yiming L, Yan L, Jinsheng Z BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):536.

PMID: 39375769 PMC: 11457322. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01992-3.


Should the existing science of teams be applied to fluid teams? An exploration of fluid team effectiveness within the context of healthcare simulation.

Grossman R, Billotti B, Ha J, Cassara M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1323469.

PMID: 38362245 PMC: 10867970. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323469.


Workforce Agility: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure.

Petermann M, Zacher H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:841862.

PMID: 35401298 PMC: 8992541. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841862.

References
1.
Loewe N, Bagherzadeh M, Araya-Castillo L, Thieme C, Batista-Foguet J . Life Domain Satisfactions as Predictors of Overall Life Satisfaction Among Workers: Evidence from Chile. Soc Indic Res. 2014; 118:71-86. PMC: 4082135. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0408-6. View

2.
Takeuchi R, Lepak D, Wang H, Takeuchi K . An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(4):1069-83. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069. View

3.
Frone M, Tidwell M . The meaning and measurement of work fatigue: Development and evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue Inventory (3D-WFI). J Occup Health Psychol. 2015; 20(3):273-288. PMC: 4505929. DOI: 10.1037/a0038700. View

4.
Ryan R, Deci E . Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2001; 55(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68. View

5.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View