» Articles » PMID: 35162085

The Psychological Structure of Loneliness

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162085
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the current surge of interest in loneliness, its health consequences, and possible remedies, the concept itself remains poorly understood. This paper seeks to contribute to a more fully worked out account of what loneliness consists in. It does this by stressing that loneliness always has an experiential component and by introducing a simple psychological structure to analyze the experience. On this basis, it suggests that we can distinguish between three ways of thinking about the phenomenal dimension of loneliness. There are objectivist views that seek to understand loneliness by a description of its intentional object, subjectivist views that consider its holistic relation to other aspects of the sufferer's psyche, and embodied and enacted views that focus on the relation between the lonely person's mental life and her social environment. The aim is not to adjudicate between these views or to suggest that they are mutually exclusive. Rather, this paper recommends a pluralistic framework on which all three approaches have something to contribute to a fuller understanding of the condition and may be of use in devising measures aimed at improving sufferers' health.

Citing Articles

Predictive factors and risk and protection groups for loneliness in older adults: a population-based study.

Montejo Carrasco P, Prada Crespo D, Garcia A, Ibanez M, Montejo Rubio B, Montenegro-Pena M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):238.

PMID: 38671496 PMC: 11055238. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01708-7.


Guidelines for evaluating and reporting social isolation and loneliness interventions.

Schoenmakers E, Lasgaard M, McHugh Power J J Health Psychol. 2024; 30(2):338-352.

PMID: 38527950 PMC: 11800726. DOI: 10.1177/13591053241238127.


The Impact of Interaction Time and Verbal Engagement with Personal Voice Assistants on Alleviating Loneliness among Older Adults: An Exploratory Study.

Yan C, Johnson K, Jones V Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(1).

PMID: 38248563 PMC: 10815345. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010100.


How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.

Maes M, Qualter P, Lodder G, Mund M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17).

PMID: 36078540 PMC: 9518421. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710816.

References
1.
Hays R, DiMatteo M . A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987; 51(1):69-81. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6. View

2.
Hawkley L, Cacioppo J . Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010; 40(2):218-27. PMC: 3874845. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8. View

3.
Ma R, Mann F, Wang J, Lloyd-Evans B, Terhune J, Al-Shihabi A . The effectiveness of interventions for reducing subjective and objective social isolation among people with mental health problems: a systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019; 55(7):839-876. PMC: 7303071. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-019-01800-z. View

4.
Heinrich L, Gullone E . The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006; 26(6):695-718. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002. View

5.
Carney J . Thinking avant la lettre: A Review of 4E Cognition. Evol Stud Imaginative Cult. 2020; 4(1):77-90. PMC: 7250653. DOI: 10.26613/esic/4.1.172. View