» Articles » PMID: 35161101

Smart Materials Prediction: Applying Machine Learning to Lithium Solid-State Electrolyte

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35161101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditionally, the discovery of new materials has often depended on scholars' computational and experimental experience. The traditional trial-and-error methods require many resources and computing time. Due to new materials' properties becoming more complex, it is difficult to predict and identify new materials only by general knowledge and experience. Material prediction tools based on machine learning (ML) have been successfully applied to various materials fields; they are beneficial for modeling and accelerating the prediction process for materials that cannot be accurately predicted. However, the obstacles of disciplinary span led to many scholars in materials not having complete knowledge of data-driven materials science methods. This paper provides an overview of the general process of ML applied to materials prediction and uses solid-state electrolytes (SSE) as an example. Recent approaches and specific applications to ML in the materials field and the requirements for building ML models for predicting lithium SSE are reviewed. Finally, some current obstacles to applying ML in materials prediction and prospects are described with the expectation that more materials scholars will be aware of the application of ML in materials prediction.

Citing Articles

Recent Applications of Theoretical Calculations and Artificial Intelligence in Solid-State Electrolyte Research: A Review.

Wu M, Wei Z, Zhao Y, He Q Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39940203 PMC: 11820664. DOI: 10.3390/nano15030225.


Liquid Crystal Orientation and Shape Optimization for the Active Response of Liquid Crystal Elastomers.

Barrera J, Cook C, Lee E, Swartz K, Tortorelli D Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38794618 PMC: 11125878. DOI: 10.3390/polym16101425.

References
1.
Artrith N, Butler K, Coudert F, Han S, Isayev O, Jain A . Best practices in machine learning for chemistry. Nat Chem. 2021; 13(6):505-508. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-021-00716-z. View

2.
Rupp M, Tkatchenko A, Muller K, Anatole von Lilienfeld O . Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012; 108(5):058301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301. View

3.
Bleidorn W, Hopwood C . Using Machine Learning to Advance Personality Assessment and Theory. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018; 23(2):190-203. DOI: 10.1177/1088868318772990. View

4.
Fan E, Li L, Wang Z, Lin J, Huang Y, Yao Y . Sustainable Recycling Technology for Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond: Challenges and Future Prospects. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(14):7020-7063. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535. View

5.
Pu J, Shao H, Gao B, Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Rao Y . matExplorer: Visual Exploration on Predicting Ionic Conductivity for Solid-state Electrolytes. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021; 28(1):65-75. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114812. View