» Articles » PMID: 35158775

Preneoplastic Low-Risk Mammary Ductal Lesions (Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Spectrum): Current Status and Future Directions

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35158775
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intraepithelial mammary ductal neoplasia is a spectrum of disease that varies from atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), low-grade (LG), intermediate-grade (IG), to high-grade (HG) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). While ADH has the lowest prognostic significance, HG-DCIS carries the highest risk. Due to widely used screening mammography, the number of intraepithelial mammary ductal neoplastic lesions has increased. The consequence of this practice is the increase in the number of patients who are overdiagnosed and, therefore, overtreated. The active surveillance (AS) trials are initiated to separate lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely monitored and only be treated when they develop a change in the clinical/radiologic characteristics. At the same time, the natural history of these lesions can be evaluated. This review aims to evaluate ADH/DCIS as a spectrum of intraductal neoplastic disease (risk and histomorphology); examine the controversies of distinguishing ADH vs. DCIS and the grading of DCIS; review the upgrading for both ADH and DCIS with emphasis on the variation of methods of detection and the definitions of upgrading; and evaluate the impact of all these variables on the AS trials.

Citing Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging insights from active surveillance of women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Greenwood H, Maldonado Rodas C, Freimanis R, Glencer A, Miller P, Mukhtar R NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024; 10(1):71.

PMID: 39098868 PMC: 11298531. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00677-9.


Stromal lymphocytes are associated with upgrade of B3 breast lesions.

Kader T, Provenzano E, Jayawardana M, Hendry S, Pang J, Elder K Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):115.

PMID: 38978071 PMC: 11232297. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01857-y.


The Evolving Approach to Breast Cancer: Moving toward De-Escalating Treatment and Personalized Medicine.

Khoury T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37444611 PMC: 10340312. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133502.

References
1.
Podoll M, Reisenbichler E, Roland L, Bruner A, Mizuguchi S, Sanders M . Feasibility of the Less Is More Approach in Treating Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Ten-Year Review of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Upgraded to Invasion at Surgery. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142(9):1120-1126. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0268-OA. View

2.
Harrison B, Hwang E, Partridge A, Thompson A, Schnitt S . Variability in diagnostic threshold for comedo necrosis among breast pathologists: implications for patient eligibility for active surveillance trials of ductal carcinoma in situ. Mod Pathol. 2019; 32(9):1257-1262. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0262-4. View

3.
Caplain A, Drouet Y, Peyron M, Peix M, Faure C, Chassagne-Clement C . Management of patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia by vacuum-assisted core biopsy: a prospective assessment of the guidelines used at our institution. Am J Surg. 2014; 208(2):260-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.029. View

4.
Fisher B, Costantino J, Wickerham D, Redmond C, Kavanah M, Cronin W . Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(18):1371-88. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371. View

5.
Kanbayashi C, Iwata H . Current approach and future perspective for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47(8):671-677. PMC: 5896693. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx059. View