» Articles » PMID: 35154548

Comparison of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, and Tacrolimus As First Steroid-sparing Agents for Complicated Relapsing/steroid-dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children: an Evaluation of the Health-related Quality of Life

Overview
Journal Arch Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Feb 14
PMID 35154548
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) leads to steroid toxicity impairing quality of life (QOL), thus prompting the use of steroid-sparing drugs.

Methods: 51 FRSDNS children not previously treated with steroid-sparing agents were randomized to receive rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or tacrolimus. Clinical findings and QOL were evaluated before and after treatment.

Results: The mean relapse rate in all groups declined six months after treatment, however, 1-year relapse-free survival rate, number of relapses, and cumulative prednisolone dosage were lower with rituximab than with tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide group had twice frequency of infections compared to the other groups. At 1 year after treatment, total scores showed greater improvement with rituximab.

Conclusions: As first-line steroid-sparing agent, rituximab is more effective and safer than cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus in FRSDNS, and improve QOL.

Citing Articles

Prolonged remission after cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus treatment in childhood nephrotic syndrome: a cohort study.

Robinson C, Aman N, Banh T, Brooke J, Chanchlani R, Dhillon V Pediatr Nephrol. 2024; .

PMID: 39576325 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-024-06605-0.


Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.

Larkins N, Hahn D, Liu I, Willis N, Craig J, Hodson E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 11:CD002290.

PMID: 39513526 PMC: 11544715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002290.pub6.


Rituximab versus tacrolimus as corticosteroid-sparing therapy for children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials.

Ang J, Widjanarko N, Ekaputra A Tzu Chi Med J. 2024; 36(3):319-329.

PMID: 38993828 PMC: 11236076. DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_234_23.


An update on the incidence, risk factors and mechanisms of rituximab-associated neutropenia.

Zhang X, Rao M, Xu G Arch Med Sci. 2024; 20(2):494-505.

PMID: 38757021 PMC: 11094828. DOI: 10.5114/aoms/152174.


Immunosuppressive agents for frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Zhu Y, Chen J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1310032.

PMID: 38464533 PMC: 10920238. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1310032.


References
1.
Ravani P, Lugani F, Drovandi S, Caridi G, Angeletti A, Ghiggeri G . Rituximab vs Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil in Recurrence of Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children and Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 175(6):631-632. PMC: 7900932. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.6150. View

2.
Takahashi T, Okamoto T, Yokota I, Sato Y, Hayashi A, Ueda Y . The effect of rituximab on the quality of life of children with refractory nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Int. 2021; 64(1):e14725. DOI: 10.1111/ped.14725. View

3.
Ravani P, Lugani F, Pisani I, Bodria M, Piaggio G, Bartolomeo D . Rituximab for very low dose steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: a randomized controlled study. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020; 35(8):1437-1444. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-020-04540-4. View

4.
Chan E, Webb H, Yu E, Ghiggeri G, Kemper M, Ma A . Both the rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression in steroid-dependent/frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome have important effects on outcomes. Kidney Int. 2019; 97(2):393-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.033. View

5.
Sinha A, Bhatia D, Gulati A, Rawat M, Dinda A, Hari P . Efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014; 30(1):96-106. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu267. View