Subjective Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Abilities, and Personal Control: Associations With Health Behaviours

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 Feb 14

PMID 35153907

Authors

Pal Kraft

Brage Kraft

Thomas Hagen

Thomas Espeseth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To examine subjective and objective socioeconomic status (SSES and OSES, respectively) as predictors, cognitive abilities as confounders, and personal control perceptions as mediators of health behaviours.

Design: A cross-sectional study including 197 participants aged 30-50 years, recruited from the crowd-working platform, Prolific.

Main Outcome Measure: The Good Health Practices Scale, a 16-item inventory of health behaviours.

Results: SSES was the most important predictor of health behaviours (beta = 0.19, < 0.01). Among the OSES indicators, education (beta = 0.16, < 0.05), but not income, predicted health behaviours. Intelligence ( = -0.16, < 0.05) and memory ( = -0.22, < 0.01) were negatively correlated with health-promoting behaviours, and the effect of memory was upheld in the multivariate model (beta = -0.17, < 0.05). Personal control perceptions (mastery and constraints) did not act as mediators.

Conclusion: SSES predicted health behaviours beyond OSES. The effect of socioeconomic indicators was not confounded by cognitive abilities. Surprisingly, cognitive abilities were negatively associated with health-promoting behaviours. Future research should emphasise SSES as a predictor of health behaviours. Delineating the psychological mechanisms linking SSES with health behaviours would be a valuable contribution toward improved understanding of socioeconomic disparities in health behaviours.

Citing Articles

Subjective social status and trajectories of frailty: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Maharani A, Richards L, Prag P BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000629.

PMID: 40018158 PMC: 11812829. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000629.

The income-happiness nexus: uncovering the importance of social comparison processes in subjective wellbeing.

Kraft P, Kraft B Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1283601.

PMID: 38078260 PMC: 10702233. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283601.

Exploring the relationship between multiple dimensions of subjective socioeconomic status and self-reported physical and mental health: the mediating role of affect.

Kraft P, Kraft B Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1138367.

PMID: 37575108 PMC: 10416252. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138367.

Compensatory cognition in neurological diseases and aging: A review of animal and human studies.

Kanishka , Jha S Aging Brain. 2023; 3:100061.

PMID: 36911258 PMC: 9997140. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbas.2022.100061.

References

Schmalor A, Heine S . The Construct of Subjective Economic Inequality. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021; 13(1):210-219. PMC: 8652364. DOI: 10.1177/1948550621996867. View

Farah M . The Neuroscience of Socioeconomic Status: Correlates, Causes, and Consequences. Neuron. 2017; 96(1):56-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.034. View

Demakakos P, Biddulph J, de Oliveira C, Tsakos G, Marmot M . Subjective social status and mortality: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018; 33(8):729-739. PMC: 6061136. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0410-z. View

Adler N, Epel E, Castellazzo G, Ickovics J . Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(6):586-92. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586. View

Destin M, Rheinschmidt-Same M, Richeson J . Status-Based Identity. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017; 12(2):270-289. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616664424. View

Reimann Z, Miller J, Dahle K, Hooper A, Young A, Goates M . Executive functions and health behaviors associated with the leading causes of death in the United States: A systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2018; 25(2):186-196. DOI: 10.1177/1359105318800829. View

Senn T, Walsh J, Carey M . The mediating roles of perceived stress and health behaviors in the relation between objective, subjective, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and perceived health. Ann Behav Med. 2014; 48(2):215-24. PMC: 4156915. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-014-9591-1. View

Conti G, Heckman J, Urzua S . THE EDUCATION-HEALTH GRADIENT. Am Econ Rev. 2014; 100(2):234-238. PMC: 3985402. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.234. View

Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R, Vagero D . Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(9):804-10. PMC: 2566032. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.041319. View

10.

Noble K, Houston S, Kan E, Sowell E . Neural correlates of socioeconomic status in the developing human brain. Dev Sci. 2012; 15(4):516-27. PMC: 6554027. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01147.x. View

11.

Huijts T, Eikemo T, Skalicka V . Income-related health inequalities in the Nordic countries: examining the role of education, occupational class, and age. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(11):1964-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.021. View

12.

Ellis B, Figueredo A, Brumbach B, Schlomer G . Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies. Hum Nat. 2014; 20(2):204-68. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7. View

13.

Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable J, Myers J . An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci. 2013; 36(6):661-79. PMC: 3856320. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196. View

14.

Carvalho S, Pinto-Gouveia J, Pimentel P, Maia D, Gilbert P, Mota-Pereira J . Entrapment and defeat perceptions in depressive symptomatology: through an evolutionary approach. Psychiatry. 2013; 76(1):53-67. DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2013.76.1.53. View

15.

Tan J, Kraus M, Carpenter N, Adler N . The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2020; 146(11):970-1020. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000258. View

16.

Crump M, McDonnell J, Gureckis T . Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e57410. PMC: 3596391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410. View

17.

Liu L, Feng T, Suo T, Lee K, Li H . Adapting to the destitute situations: poverty cues lead to short-term choice. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e33950. PMC: 3329522. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033950. View

18.

Diamond A . Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012; 64:135-68. PMC: 4084861. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. View

19.

Hoebel J, Lampert T . Subjective social status and health: Multidisciplinary explanations and methodological challenges. J Health Psychol. 2018; 25(2):173-185. DOI: 10.1177/1359105318800804. View

20.

Cheung F, Lucas R . Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 110(2):332-41. PMC: 4718872. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000059. View