» Articles » PMID: 35152897

Towards Functional Robotic Training: Motor Learning of Dynamic Tasks is Enhanced by Haptic Rendering but Hampered by Arm Weight Support

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current robot-aided training allows for high-intensity training but might hamper the transfer of learned skills to real daily tasks. Many of these tasks, e.g., carrying a cup of coffee, require manipulating objects with complex dynamics. Thus, the absence of somatosensory information regarding the interaction with virtual objects during robot-aided training might be limiting the potential benefits of robotic training on motor (re)learning. We hypothesize that providing somatosensory information through the haptic rendering of virtual environments might enhance motor learning and skill transfer. Furthermore, the inclusion of haptic rendering might increase the task realism, enhancing participants' agency and motivation. Providing arm weight support during training might also enhance learning by limiting participants' fatigue.

Methods: We conducted a study with 40 healthy participants to evaluate how haptic rendering and arm weight support affect motor learning and skill transfer of a dynamic task. The task consisted of inverting a virtual pendulum whose dynamics were haptically rendered on an exoskeleton robot designed for upper limb neurorehabilitation. Participants trained with or without haptic rendering and with or without weight support. Participants' task performance, movement strategy, effort, motivation, and agency were evaluated during baseline, short- and long-term retention. We also evaluated if the skills acquired during training transferred to a similar task with a shorter pendulum.

Results: We found that haptic rendering significantly increases participants' movement variability during training and the ability to synchronize their movements with the pendulum, which is correlated with better performance. Weight support also enhances participants' movement variability during training and reduces participants' physical effort. Importantly, we found that training with haptic rendering enhances motor learning and skill transfer, while training with weight support hampers learning compared to training without weight support. We did not observe any significant differences between training modalities regarding agency and motivation during training and retention tests.

Conclusion: Haptic rendering is a promising tool to boost robot-aided motor learning and skill transfer to tasks with similar dynamics. However, further work is needed to find how to simultaneously provide robotic assistance and haptic rendering without hampering motor learning, especially in brain-injured patients. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04759976.

Citing Articles

Enhancing stroke rehabilitation with whole-hand haptic rendering: development and clinical usability evaluation of a novel upper-limb rehabilitation device.

Ratz R, Conti F, Thaler I, Muri R, Marchal-Crespo L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):172.

PMID: 39334423 PMC: 11437669. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01439-1.


Evaluating tactile feedback in addition to kinesthetic feedback for haptic shape rendering: a pilot study.

Ratschat A, van Rooij B, Luijten J, Marchal-Crespo L Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1298537.

PMID: 38660067 PMC: 11039957. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1298537.


Learning and navigating digitally rendered haptic spatial layouts.

Tivadar R, Franceschiello B, Minier A, Murray M NPJ Sci Learn. 2023; 8(1):61.

PMID: 38102127 PMC: 10724186. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-023-00208-4.


Novel Platform for Quantitative Assessment of Functional Object Interactions After Stroke.

Nayeem R, Sohn W, DiCarlo J, Gochyyev P, Lin D, Sternad D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022; 31:426-436.

PMID: 36455078 PMC: 10079607. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3226067.

References
1.
Mayer H, Krechetnikov R . Walking with coffee: why does it spill?. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012; 85(4 Pt 2):046117. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.046117. View

2.
Gassert R, Dietz V . Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):46. PMC: 5987585. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x. View

3.
Borich M, Brodie S, Gray W, Ionta S, Boyd L . Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 79(Pt B):246-55. PMC: 4904790. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.007. View

4.
Marchal-Crespo L, Bannwart M, Riener R, Vallery H . The Effect of Haptic Guidance on Learning a Hybrid Rhythmic-Discrete Motor Task. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014; 8(2):222-34. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2014.2375173. View

5.
Prange G, Jannink M, Stienen A, Van Der Kooij H, IJzerman M, Hermens H . Influence of gravity compensation on muscle activation patterns during different temporal phases of arm movements of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(5):478-85. DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328720. View