Preferences of Psychotherapists for Blended Care in Germany: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview

Journal BMC Psychiatry

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2022 Feb 13

PMID 35151294

Authors

Elena A Phillips

Sebastian Himmler

Jonas Schreyogg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Digital treatment formats are emerging within mental health care. Evidence suggests that mental health care providers and recipients prefer a combination of digital and traditional elements within psychotherapy treatment formats, also called blended care (BC), over standalone digital formats. We examined the attitudes and preferences of licensed psychotherapists in Germany regarding such BC applications.

Methods: We fielded a survey among psychotherapists, including questions about attitudes, previous experiences, and expectations regarding BC, as well as a discrete choice experiment. Attributes for the experiment were developed using a stepwise qualitative approach. A Bayesian D-efficient design was used to generate the choice tasks. The choice data were analyzed by applying mixed logit models.

Results: The survey was completed by 200 psychotherapists. Attitudes towards BC were mainly positive, with strong reported intentions to use BC formats. In the choice experiment, recommendation from a professional society for a BC online component was the most important characteristic. Greater effectiveness and a larger share of face-to-face vs. online time were also desired features, while a financial incentive to use BC was less relevant.

Citing Articles

Preferences Regarding Information Strategies for Digital Mental Health Interventions Among Medical Students: Discrete Choice Experiment.

Vomhof M, Bau J, Huter P, Stehl S, Haastert B, Loerbroks A JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e55921.

PMID: 39365652 PMC: 11489795. DOI: 10.2196/55921.

Virtual Service Delivery in Mental Health and Substance Use Care: A Systematic Review of Preference Elicitation Studies.

Mallise C, Wall L, Paolucci F, Davies K, La Hera Fuentes G, Wilson J Community Ment Health J. 2024; 61(3):440-461.

PMID: 39269570 PMC: 11868160. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01350-y.

Experts' views on the implementation of digital interventions for eating disorders: a Delphi study.

Lemmer D, Mayer G, Schrader P, Michelsen I, Friederich H, Bauer S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2486.

PMID: 39267038 PMC: 11396553. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19989-3.

Efficacy of a Brief Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in University Students: Uncontrolled Intervention Study.

Atik E, Stricker J, Schuckes M, Pittig A JMIR Ment Health. 2023; 10:e44742.

PMID: 37624631 PMC: 10492172. DOI: 10.2196/44742.

A Systematic Review of Mobile Apps as an Adjunct to Psychological Interventions for Emotion Dysregulation.

Diano F, Sica L, Ponticorvo M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36674189 PMC: 9864409. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021431.

References

Schuster R, Leitner I, Carlbring P, Laireiter A . Exploring blended group interventions for depression: Randomised controlled feasibility study of a blended computer- and multimedia-supported psychoeducational group intervention for adults with depressive symptoms. Internet Interv. 2018; 8:63-71. PMC: 6096250. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.04.001. View

Christensen H, Hickie I . Using e-health applications to deliver new mental health services. Med J Aust. 2010; 192(S11):S53-6. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03695.x. View

Reed Johnson F, Yang J, Reed S . The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments. Value Health. 2019; 22(2):157-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.876. View

Campbell D, Erdem S . Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider. Patient. 2018; 12(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0324-6. View

Mathiasen K, Andersen T, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Roessler K . Blended CBT versus face-to-face CBT: a randomised non-inferiority trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16(1):432. PMC: 5139089. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-1140-y. View

Wentzel J, van der Vaart R, Bohlmeijer E, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Mixing Online and Face-to-Face Therapy: How to Benefit From Blended Care in Mental Health Care. JMIR Ment Health. 2016; 3(1):e9. PMC: 4764785. DOI: 10.2196/mental.4534. View

Wind T, Rijkeboer M, Andersson G, Riper H . The COVID-19 pandemic: The 'black swan' for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interv. 2020; 20:100317. PMC: 7104190. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317. View

Mol M, van Genugten C, Dozeman E, van Schaik D, Draisma S, Riper H . Why Uptake of Blended Internet-Based Interventions for Depression Is Challenging: A Qualitative Study on Therapists' Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(1). PMC: 7019532. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010091. View

Etzelmueller A, Radkovsky A, Hannig W, Berking M, Ebert D . Patient's experience with blended video- and internet based cognitive behavioural therapy service in routine care. Internet Interv. 2018; 12:165-175. PMC: 6096318. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.01.003. View

10.

Rolstad S, Adler J, Ryden A . Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011; 14(8):1101-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003. View

11.

van der Vaart R, Witting M, Riper H, Kooistra L, Bohlmeijer E, van Gemert-Pijnen L . Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14:355. PMC: 4271498. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z. View

12.

Erbe D, Eichert H, Riper H, Ebert D . Blending Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Mental Disorders in Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(9):e306. PMC: 5622288. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6588. View

13.

Dijksman I, Dinant G, Spigt M . The Perception and Needs of Psychologists Toward Blended Care. Telemed J E Health. 2017; 23(12):983-995. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0031. View

14.

Renn B, Hoeft T, Lee H, Bauer A, Arean P . Preference for in-person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the U.S. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:6. PMC: 6550152. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1. View

15.

Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E . Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13(3):288-95. PMC: 4219070. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20151. View

16.

Musiat P, Goldstone P, Tarrier N . Understanding the acceptability of e-mental health--attitudes and expectations towards computerised self-help treatments for mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14:109. PMC: 3999507. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-109. View

17.

Lancsar E, Fiebig D, Hole A . Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017; 35(7):697-716. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4. View

18.

Schuster R, Pokorny R, Berger T, Topooco N, Laireiter A . The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Blended Therapy: Survey Study Amongst Licensed Psychotherapists in Austria. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(12):e11007. PMC: 6315274. DOI: 10.2196/11007. View

19.

Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E, Ellis A, Vass C . Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 37(2):201-226. PMC: 6386055. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2. View

20.

Barak A, Klein B, Proudfoot J . Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7. View