» Articles » PMID: 35146458

Local Aortic Aneurysm Wall Expansion Measured with Automated Image Analysis

Overview
Journal JVS Vasc Sci
Date 2022 Feb 11
PMID 35146458
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Assessment of regional aortic wall deformation (RAWD) might better predict for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture than the maximal aortic diameter or growth rate. Using sequential computed tomography angiograms (CTAs), we developed a streamlined, semiautomated method of computing RAWD using deformable image registration (dirRAWD).

Methods: Paired sequential CTAs performed 1 to 2 years apart of 15 patients with AAAs of various shapes and sizes were selected. Using each patient's initial CTA, the luminal and aortic wall surfaces were segmented both manually and semiautomatically. Next, the same patient's follow-up CTA was aligned with the first using automated rigid image registration. Deformable image registration was then used to calculate the local aneurysm wall expansion between the sequential scans (dirRAWD). To measure technique accuracy, the deformable registration results were compared with the local displacement of anatomic landmarks (fiducial markers), such as the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery and/or aortic wall calcifications. Additionally, for each patient, the maximal RAWD was manually measured for each aneurysm and was compared with the dirRAWD at the same location.

Results: The technique was successful in all patients. The mean landmark displacement error was 0.59 ± 0.93 mm with no difference between true landmark displacement and deformable registration landmark displacement by Wilcoxon rank sum test ( = .39). The absolute difference between the manually measured maximal RAWD and dirRAWD was 0.27 ± 0.23 mm, with a relative difference of 7.9% and no difference using the Wilcoxon rank sum test ( = .69). No differences were found in the maximal dirRAWD when derived using a purely manual AAA segmentation compared with using semiautomated AAA segmentation ( = .55).

Conclusions: We found accurate and automated RAWD measurements were feasible with clinically insignificant errors. Using semiautomated AAA segmentations for deformable image registration methods did not alter maximal dirRAWD accuracy compared with using manual AAA segmentations. Future work will compare dirRAWD with finite element analysis-derived regional wall stress and determine whether dirRAWD might serve as an independent predictor of rupture risk.

Citing Articles

ADEPT: A Noninvasive Method for Determining Elastic Parameters of Valve Tissue.

Wu W, Daneker M, Herz C, Dewey H, Weiss J, Pouch A ArXiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990796 PMC: 11844617.


Three-dimensional characterization of sex differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm progression via vascular deformation mapping.

Braet D, Baker T, Delbono L, Spahlinger G, Graham N, Arora A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24215.

PMID: 39414930 PMC: 11484807. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75334-z.


Enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia are associated with arteries not veins.

Oltmer J, Mattern H, Beck J, Yakupov R, Greenberg S, Zwanenburg J J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024; 44(11):1362-1377.

PMID: 38863151 PMC: 11542128. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X241260629.


Full-field strain mapping of healthy and pathological mouse aortas using stereo digital image correlation.

Lane B, Cardoza R, Lessner S, Vyavahare N, Sutton M, Eberth J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 141:105745.

PMID: 36893686 PMC: 10081968. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105745.

References
1.
Boes J, Hoff B, Hylton N, Pickles M, Turnbull L, Schott A . Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response. Transl Oncol. 2014; 7(1):101-10. PMC: 3998680. DOI: 10.1593/tlo.14121. View

2.
Keith L, Ross B, Galban C, Luker G, Galban S, Zhao B . Semiautomated Workflow for Clinically Streamlined Glioma Parametric Response Mapping. Tomography. 2017; 2(4):267-275. PMC: 5345939. DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00181. View

3.
Subasic M, Loncaric S, Sorantin E . 3-D image analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001; 77:1195-200. View

4.
Pappu S, Dardik A, Tagare H, Gusberg R . Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007; 22(1):88-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.004. View

5.
Georgakarakos E, Ioannou C, Papaharilaou Y, Kostas T, Katsamouris A . Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far?. J Endovasc Ther. 2011; 18(2):214-25. DOI: 10.1583/10-3244.1. View