» Articles » PMID: 35145411

A Systematic Review of Nudge Interventions to Optimize Medication Prescribing

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2022 Feb 11
PMID 35145411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The benefits of medication optimization are largely uncontroversial but difficult to achieve. Behavior change interventions aiming to optimize prescriber medication-related decisions, which do not forbid any option and that do not significantly change financial incentives, offer a promising way forward. These interventions are often referred to as nudges. The current systematic literature review characterizes published studies describing nudge interventions to optimize medication prescribing by the behavioral determinants they intend to influence and the techniques they apply. Four databases were searched (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL) to identify studies with nudge-type interventions aiming to optimize prescribing decisions. To describe the behavioral determinants that interventionists aimed to influence, data were extracted according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). To describe intervention techniques applied, data were extracted according to the Behavior Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy version 1 and MINDSPACE. Next, the recommended TDF-BCT mappings were used to appraise whether each intervention applied a sufficient array of techniques to influence all identified behavioral determinants. The current review located 15 studies comprised of 20 interventions. Of the 20 interventions, 16 interventions (80%) were effective. The behavior change techniques most often applied involved prompts ( = 13). The MINDSPACE contextual influencer most often applied involved defaults ( = 10). According to the recommended TDF-BCT mappings, only two interventions applied a sufficient array of behavior change techniques to address the behavioral determinants the interventionists aimed to influence. The fact that so many interventions successfully changed prescriber behavior encourages the development of future behavior change interventions to optimize prescribing without mandates or financial incentives. The current review encourages interventionists to understand the behavioral determinants they are trying to affect, before the selection and application of techniques to change prescribing behaviors. : [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020168006].

Citing Articles

Can behavioural science be used to understand factors that influence the prescription choice for Parkinson's disease? A pan-European focus group study of clinicians' prescribing practice.

Begley E, Thomas J, Hind W, Senior C BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e090018.

PMID: 39971601 PMC: 11840894. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090018.


Primary Healthcare Physicians' Insufficient Knowledge Is Associated with Antibiotic Overprescribing for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kadirhaz M, Zhang Y, Atif N, Liu W, Ji W, Zhao N Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39452190 PMC: 11505141. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13100923.


The Feasibility of AgileNudge+ Software to Facilitate Positive Behavioral Change: Mixed Methods Design.

Shojaei F, Shojaei F, Desai A, Long E, Mehta J, Fowler N JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e57390.

PMID: 39302134 PMC: 11602761. DOI: 10.2196/57390.


Nudging strategies to influence prescribers' behavior toward reducing opioid prescriptions: a systematic scoping review.

Diwan S, Vilhelmsson A, Wolf A, Jildenstal P J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(9):3000605241272733.

PMID: 39258400 PMC: 11402103. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241272733.


A Quality Initiative to Improve Appropriate Medication Dosing in Pediatric Patients with Obesity.

Cloyd C, Macedone D, Merandi J, Pierson S, Sellas Wcislo M, Lutmer J Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024; 9(3):e741.

PMID: 38868757 PMC: 11167219. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000741.


References
1.
Hemens B, Holbrook A, Tonkin M, Mackay J, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T . Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:89. PMC: 3179735. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-89. View

2.
Lemiengre M, Verbakel J, Colman R, De Burghgraeve T, Buntinx F, Aertgeerts B . Reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for children in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial of two interventions. Br J Gen Pract. 2018; 68(668):e204-e210. PMC: 5819986. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X695033. View

3.
Shakespeare T, Fehlberg M, Slejko T, Taylor J, Srbinovska I, Bolsin S . Successful use of "Choice Architecture" and "Nudge Theory" in a quality improvement initiative of analgesia administration after Caesarean section. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018; 25(1):125-129. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13037. View

4.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

5.
Sacarny A, Barnett M, Le J, Tetkoski F, Yokum D, Agrawal S . Effect of Peer Comparison Letters for High-Volume Primary Care Prescribers of Quetiapine in Older and Disabled Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018; 75(10):1003-1011. PMC: 6233799. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1867. View