» Articles » PMID: 35145135

A Predictive Model and a Field Study on Heterogeneous Slug Distribution in Arable Fields Arising from Density Dependent Movement

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Feb 11
PMID 35145135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Factors and processes determining heterogeneous ('patchy') population distributions in natural environments have long been a major focus in ecology. Existing theoretical approaches proved to be successful in explaining vegetation patterns. In the case of animal populations, existing theories are at most conceptual: they may suggest a qualitative explanation but largely fail to explain patchiness quantitatively. We aim to bridge this knowledge gap. We present a new mechanism of self-organized formation of a patchy spatial population distribution. A factor that was under-appreciated by pattern formation theories is animal sociability, which may result in density dependent movement behaviour. Our approach was inspired by a recent project on movement and distribution of slugs in arable fields. The project discovered a strongly heterogeneous slug distribution and a specific density dependent individual movement. In this paper, we bring these two findings together. We develop a model of density dependent animal movement to account for the switch in the movement behaviour when the local population density exceeds a certain threshold. The model is fully parameterized using the field data. We then show that the model produces spatial patterns with properties closely resembling those observed in the field, in particular to exhibit similar values of the aggregation index.

Citing Articles

Spatial Aggregations of the Grey Field Slug Are Unstable Under Abnormally High Soil Moisture Conditions.

Price C, Harris W, Forbes E, Walters K Insects. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452395 PMC: 11508239. DOI: 10.3390/insects15100819.


Barriers with Valve Mechanisms Are Predicted to Protect Crops from Slug Carriers of Rat Lungworm Disease.

Pang G, Hou A, Tamashiro R, Mills K, Pang L Pathogens. 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37375537 PMC: 10302935. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12060847.

References
1.
Segel L, Jackson J . Dissipative structure: an explanation and an ecological example. J Theor Biol. 1972; 37(3):545-59. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(72)90090-2. View

2.
Nathan R, Getz W, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D . A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(49):19052-9. PMC: 2614714. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800375105. View

3.
Thomas C, Parkinson L, Marshall E . Isolating the components of activity-density for the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in farmland. Oecologia. 2017; 116(1-2):103-112. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050568. View

4.
Sekiguchi Y, Hata T . Effects of the mere presence of conspecifics on the motor performance of rats: Higher speed and lower accuracy. Behav Processes. 2018; 159:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.012. View

5.
Petrovskaya N, Petrovskii S, Murchie A . Challenges of ecological monitoring: estimating population abundance from sparse trap counts. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 9(68):420-35. PMC: 3262429. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0386. View