Complications After Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Fractures: a Five-year Follow-up of 194 Patients

Overview

Journal Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2022 Feb 10

PMID 35142922

Authors

Natalie Lundin

Anders Enocson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical treatment of pelvic fractures is an advanced intervention associated with multiple complications. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the rate of unplanned reoperations after pelvic fracture surgery. Secondary aims included occurrence of other adverse events and mortality.

Methods: All adult patients ≥ 18 years with surgically treated pelvic fracture operated at the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden between 2010 and 2019 were identified and retrospectively included. Data were collected through review of medical records and radiographs. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with unplanned reoperations and other adverse events.

Results: A total of 194 patients were included with mean age (± SD, range) 45.4 (16, 18-83) years. 62% were males (n = 121) and the median (IQR) follow-up time was 1890 (1791) days (4.9 years). Forty-eight patients (25%) had an unplanned reoperation, with infection being the most common cause of reoperation (n = 18, 9.3%). Seventy-eight (40%) patients had an adverse event not requiring reoperation and the most common event was nerve injury (n = 34, 18%). Concomitant abdominal injury was identified as a risk factor for an adverse event (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.9, p < 0.01). 30-day mortality was 1.5% and 1-year mortality 6.2%.

Conclusion: The rate of unplanned reoperation after pelvic fracture surgery was high, as was the rate of other adverse events not requiring surgery. No identified risk factor was found to predict further surgery, but concomitant abdominal injury was a risk factor for other adverse events. Mortality was low at both 30 days and 1 year.

Citing Articles

Comparison of spinopelvic fixation and iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Demir E, Barca F, Havitcioglu C, Atilla H, Akdogan M Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025; 31(1):75-83.

PMID: 39775508 PMC: 11843391. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.32050.

References

Balogh Z, King K, Mackay P, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Evans J . The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma. 2007; 63(5):1066-73. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4. View

Abdelrahman H, El-Menyar A, Keil H, Alhammoud A, Ghouri S, Babikir E . Patterns, management, and outcomes of traumatic pelvic fracture: insights from a multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):249. PMC: 7344030. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01772-w. View

Bellabarba C, Schildhauer T, Vaccaro A, Chapman J . Complications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(11 Suppl):S80-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217949.31762.be. View

Andrew Sems S, Johnson M, Cole P, Byrd C, Templeman D . Elevated body mass index increases early complications of surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(5):309-14. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181caa21e. View

Bakhshayesh P, Weidenhielm L, Enocson A . Factors affecting mortality and reoperations in high-energy pelvic fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(7):1273-1282. PMC: 6132923. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2203-1. View

Rinne P, Laitinen M, Kannus P, Mattila V . The incidence of pelvic fractures and related surgery in the Finnish adult population: a nationwide study of 33,469 patients between 1997 and 2014. Acta Orthop. 2020; 91(5):587-592. PMC: 8023963. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1771827. View

Melhem E, Riouallon G, Habboubi K, Gabbas M, Jouffroy P . Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(5):831-839. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019. View

Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S . Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 81(6):955-62. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8571. View

Buller L, Best M, Quinnan S . A Nationwide Analysis of Pelvic Ring Fractures: Incidence and Trends in Treatment, Length of Stay, and Mortality. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016; 7(1):9-17. PMC: 4748159. DOI: 10.1177/2151458515616250. View

10.

Zwingmann J, Sudkamp N, Konig B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Aghayev E . Intra- and postoperative complications of navigated and conventional techniques in percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic fractures: Results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry. Injury. 2013; 44(12):1765-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.008. View

11.

Ochenjele G, Reid K, Castillo R, Schoonover C, Montalvo R, Manson T . Predictors of Unplanned Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(7):e245-e250. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001170. View

12.

Krappinger D, Larndorfer R, Struve P, Rosenberger R, Arora R, Blauth M . Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring: a clinical and radiological follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(9):595-602. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318158abcf. View

13.

Burgess A, Eastridge B, Young J, Ellison T, Ellison Jr P, Poka A . Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma. 1990; 30(7):848-56. View

14.

Hartensuer R, Lodde M, Keller J, Eveslage M, Stolberg-Stolberg J, Riesenbeck O . Safety, Effect and Feasibility of Percutaneous SI-Screw with and without Augmentation-A 15-Year Retrospective Analysis on over 640 Screws. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(8). PMC: 7463525. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082660. View

15.

Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L . Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01197-3. View

16.

Sharma O, Oswanski M, Rabbi J, Georgiadis G, Lauer S, Stombaugh H . Pelvic fracture risk assessment on admission. Am Surg. 2008; 74(8):761-6. View

17.

Palmcrantz J, Hardcastle T, Naidoo S, Muckart D, Ahlm K, Eriksson A . Pelvic fractures at a new level 1 trauma centre: who dies from pelvic trauma? The Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital experience. Orthop Surg. 2012; 4(4):216-21. PMC: 6583249. DOI: 10.1111/os.12002. View

18.

Fitzgerald C, Morse B, Dente C . Pelvic ring fractures: has mortality improved following the implementation of damage control resuscitation?. Am J Surg. 2014; 208(6):1083-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.002. View

19.

Mann S, Banaszek D, Lajkosz K, Brogly S, Stanojev S, Evans C . High-energy trauma patients with pelvic fractures: Management trends in Ontario, Canada. Injury. 2018; 49(10):1830-1840. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.044. View

20.

Holtenius J, Bakhshayesh P, Enocson A . The pelvic fracture - Indicator of injury severity or lethal fracture?. Injury. 2018; 49(8):1568-1571. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.016. View