» Articles » PMID: 35140273

Pilot Study to Determine Differences in Breath Odour Between Cigarette and E-cigarette Consumers

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Feb 10
PMID 35140273
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cigarette smoke is known to influence breath odour, but the effect of e-cigarettes is unknown. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine differences in breath odour between cigarette smokers (CSs) and e-cigarette consumers (ECs) in 33 healthy subjects: 11 CSs, 11 ECs and 11 non-smokers (NSs). Breath was sampled at baseline and following product use (CSs and ECs) or a waiting period (NSs) by eight trained odour judges using a six-point smoke intensity scale and a nine-point hedonic scale. We observed a statistically significant difference between CSs and ECs. Smoke intensity values were significantly higher in CSs than ECs and NSs, which were comparable both at baseline and after product use. In addition, hedonic values for CSs were significantly lower than both NSs and ECs after product use. These acute results indicate that cigarette and e-cigarette use results in significantly different breath. ECs breath has a reduced smoke odour and more pleasant aroma than CSs, and is comparable to NSs. This suggests there may be cosmetic benefits for CSs who quit smoking or switch to exclusive use of ECs. Further studies are required to understand the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on breath odour.

Citing Articles

The risk profile of electronic nicotine delivery systems, compared to traditional cigarettes, on oral disease: a review.

Zhang Q, Wen C Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1146949.

PMID: 37255760 PMC: 10226679. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1146949.

References
1.
Sharma N, Galustians H, Qaqish J, Galustians A, Petrone M, Rustogi K . The clinical efficacy of Colgate Total Plus Whitening Toothpaste containing a special grade of silica and Colgate Total Toothpaste for controlling breath odor twelve hours after toothbrushing: a single-use clinical study. J Clin Dent. 2001; 13(2):73-6. View

2.
Marco E, Grimalt J . A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco cigarette and electronic cigarette smokers. J Chromatogr A. 2015; 1410:51-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.094. View

3.
Greenman J, Duffield J, Spencer P, Rosenberg M, Corry D, Saad S . Study on the organoleptic intensity scale for measuring oral malodor. J Dent Res. 2003; 83(1):81-5. DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300116. View

4.
Dalrymple A, Badrock T, Terry A, Barber M, Hall P, Thorne D . Assessment of enamel discoloration in vitro following exposure to cigarette smoke and emissions from novel vapor and tobacco heating products. Am J Dent. 2018; 31(5):227-233. View

5.
Jiun I, Siddik S, Malik S, Tin-Oo M, Alam M, Khan M . Association Between Oral Hygiene Status and Halitosis Among Smokers and Nonsmokers. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015; 13(5):395-405. DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a33920. View