Background:
Cerebral aneurysms should be treated before rupture because ruptured aneurysms result in serious disability. Therefore, accurate prediction of rupture risk is important and has been estimated using various hemodynamic factors.
Objective:
To suggest a new way to predict rupture risk in cerebral aneurysms using a novel deep learning model based on hemodynamic parameters for better decision-making about treatment.
Methods:
A novel convolutional neural network (CNN) model was used for rupture risk prediction retrospectively of 123 aneurysm cases. To include the effect of hemodynamic parameters into the CNN, the hemodynamic parameters were first calculated using computational fluid dynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Then, they were converted into images for training the CNN using a novel approach. In addition, new data augmentation methods were devised to obtain sufficient training data. A total of 53,136 images generated by data augmentation were used to train and test the CNN.
Results:
The CNNs trained with wall shear stress (WSS), strain, and combination images had area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values of 0.716, 0.741, and 0.883, respectively. Based on the cut-off values, the CNN trained with WSS (sensitivity: 0.5, specificity: 0.79) or strain (sensitivity: 0.74, specificity: 0.71) images alone was not highly predictive. However, the CNN trained with combination images of WSS and strain showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.
Conclusion:
CNN-based deep learning algorithm using hemodynamic factors, including WSS and strain, could be an effective tool for predicting rupture risk in cerebral aneurysms with good predictive accuracy.
Citing Articles
Fluid structure Interaction analysis for rupture risk assessment in patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms.
Nagy J, Fenz W, Thumfart S, Maier J, Major Z, Stefanits H
Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1965.
PMID: 39809833
PMC: 11733281.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-85066-9.
Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the Risk of Rupture of Intracranial Aneurysms: a Systematic Review.
Daga K, Agarwal S, Moti Z, Lee M, Din M, Wood D
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 35(1):3-16.
PMID: 39546007
PMC: 11832721.
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01474-4.
Diagnostic and predictive value of radiomics-based machine learning for intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhong J, Jiang Y, Huang Q, Yang S
Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):845.
PMID: 39528874
PMC: 11554722.
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03086-5.
Integrating PointNet-Based Model and Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.
Shou Y, Chen Z, Feng P, Wei Y, Qi B, Dong R
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).
PMID: 39061742
PMC: 11273784.
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070660.
Quantitative analysis of hemodynamic changes induced by the discrepancy between the sizes of the flow diverter and parent artery.
Kim S, Yang H, Oh J, Kim Y
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10653.
PMID: 38724557
PMC: 11081945.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61312-y.
Compare deep learning model and conventional logistic regression model for the identification of unstable saccular intracranial aneurysms in computed tomography angiography.
Zeng L, Zhao X, Wen L, Jing Y, Xu J, Huang C
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(4):2993-3005.
PMID: 38617165
PMC: 11007515.
DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1732.
Influence of circle of Willis modeling on hemodynamic parameters in anterior communicating artery aneurysms and recommendations for model selection.
Yang H, Cho K, Hong I, Kim Y, Kim Y, Kim J
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8476.
PMID: 38605063
PMC: 11009257.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59042-2.
Assessment of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk using a point cloud-based deep learning model.
Cao H, Zeng H, Lv L, Wang Q, Ouyang H, Gui L
Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1293380.
PMID: 38426204
PMC: 10901972.
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1293380.
Global trend in research of intracranial aneurysm management with artificial intelligence technology: a bibliometric analysis.
Zhang F, Turhon M, Huang J, Li M, Liu J, Zhang Y
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(1):1022-1038.
PMID: 38223110
PMC: 10784100.
DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-793.
Prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,670 participants.
Habibi M, Fakhfouri A, Mirjani M, Razavi A, Mortezaei A, Soleimani Y
Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):34.
PMID: 38183490
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02271-2.
Investigation of paraclinoid aneurysm formation by comparing the combined influence of hemodynamic parameters between aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal arteries.
Yang H, Kim J, Kim Y, Cho K, Oh J
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023; 44(8):1393-1403.
PMID: 38051823
PMC: 11342732.
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X231218589.
Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: A Review of Current Topics and Competition Challenges.
Wagner D, Tilmans L, Peng K, Niedermeier M, Rohl M, Ryan S
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(16).
PMID: 37627929
PMC: 10453240.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162670.
The Current Limitations and Advanced Analysis of Hemodynamic Study of Cerebral Aneurysms.
Cho K
Neurointervention. 2023; 18(2):107-113.
PMID: 37337398
PMC: 10318229.
DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2023.00164.