» Articles » PMID: 35137777

Clinical Profile and 30-Day Outcomes of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Undergoing Aortic Valve And/or Aorta Surgery

Abstract

Background: The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) affects 0.5 to 2% of the population and is associated with valve and aortic alterations. There is a lack of studies on the profile of these patients in the Brazilian population.

Objective: To describe the profile of patients with BAV undergoing valve and/or aortic surgery in a tertiary cardiology center, in addition to the outcomes related to the intervention.

Methods: Retrospective cohort including 195 patients (mean age 54±14 years, 73.8% male) diagnosed with BAV who underwent surgical approach (valvular and/or aorta) from 2014 to 2019. Clinical data, echocardiographic and tomographic studies were evaluated, as well as characteristics of the intervention and events in 30 days. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: We found a high prevalence of aortic aneurysm (56.5%), with a mean diameter of 46.9±10.2 mm. Major aortic regurgitation was found in 25.1% and major aortic stenosis in 54.9%. Isolated aortic valve surgery was performed in 48.2%, isolated aortic surgery in 6.7% and combined surgery in 45.1%. The 30-day mortality was 8.2%. In the multivariate analysis, the predictors of the combined outcome at 30 days (death, atrial fibrillation and reoperation) were age (OR 1.044, 95% CI 1.009-1.081, p=0.014) and left ventricular mass index (OR 1.009, 95% CI 1.000-1.018, p=0.044).

Conclusion: Patients with BAV approached in our service have a higher incidence of aortopathy, with the additional need to evaluate the aorta with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Citing Articles

Clinical Profile and Outcomes in 30 Days of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Undergoing Aortic Valve and/or Aortic Surgery.

Evora P Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 118(3):597-598.

PMID: 35319609 PMC: 8959031. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20211018.

References
1.
Tarasoutchi F, Montera M, Ramos A, Sampaio R, Rosa V, Augusto Duenhas Accorsi T . . Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 109(6 suppl 2):1-34. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180007. View

2.
Fernandez B, Fernandez M, Duran A, Lopez D, Martire A, Sans-Coma V . Anatomy and formation of congenital bicuspid and quadricuspid pulmonary valves in Syrian hamsters. Anat Rec. 1998; 250(1):70-9. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199801)250:1<70::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-I. View

3.
Hiratzka L, Bakris G, Beckman J, Bersin R, Carr V, Casey Jr D . 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice.... Circulation. 2010; 121(13):e266-369. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e. View

4.
Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, Thanassoulis G, Tremblay S, Jamorski M . Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2008; 300(11):1317-25. DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1317. View

5.
Girdauskas E, Disha K, Borger M, Kuntze T . Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 147(1):276-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.004. View