Evaluation of Low-kVp Low-Volume Iodinated Contrast Protocol for Coronary CT Angiography Using Retrospective ECG Gating

Overview

Journal Indian J Radiol Imaging

Publisher Thieme

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Feb 9

PMID 35136504

Authors

Atul Kapoor

Goldaa Mahajan

Aprajita Kapoor

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of low peak kilovoltage (kVp) low-volume iodinated contrast protocol for performing coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA) in patients using retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG) gating. Hundred prospective patients undergoing CCTA were studied in two groups, A and B, using 70 kilovoltage (kV) and 120 kV protocols with half and standard intravenous volumes of injected iodinated contrast, respectively. All patients had heart rates less than 100 beats/min and body mass index (BMI) less than 31 kg/m . Both the groups were evaluated for signal-to-noise (S/N) and contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios along with radiation dose delivered in millisievert (mSv), and for image quality (IQ), on per patient and per segment basis. Patients with group A showed statistically reduced radiation dose of 1.86 mSv compared with 6.86 mSv in group B patients. Marked reduction in image noise with statistically improved S/N and C/N ratios in all coronary vessels was seen in group A. S/N ratios in group A were 20.25, 18.68, 19.04, 17.41, and 18.69 for aorta, left main, left anterior descending, right coronary, and left circumflex arteries while they were 13.34, 11.12, 10.96, 9.74, and 8.67 in group B patients. C/N ratios were also higher in all vessels in group A patients, that is, 19.48, 19.48, 19.04, 19.48, and 17.68, compared with group B patients, who had 12.43, 10.03, 9.23, 9.57, and 8.23 ratios ( < 0.0001). No significant difference in IQ per patient and per vessel was seen between both the groups. Retrospective ECG-gated low-kVp low-volume iodinated contrast protocol provides good diagnostic quality angiograms in patients with BMI up to 31 kg/m and with heart rates of less than 100 beats/min with three times reduced radiation dose. The reduced volume of contrast reduces the cost as well as the chance of contrast-induced nephropathy.

References

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S . Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation. 2006; 113(10):1305-10. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490. View

Harder A, Willemink M, de Ruiter Q, de Jong P, Schilham A, Krestin G . Dose reduction with iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015; 89(1058):20150068. PMC: 4985187. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150068. View

Gordic S, Husarik D, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H . High-pitch coronary CT angiography with third generation dual-source CT: limits of heart rate. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 30(6):1173-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0445-5. View

Zhang L, Qi L, De Cecco C, Zhou C, Spearman J, Schoepf U . High-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with low contrast medium volume: comparison of 80 and 100 kVp high-pitch protocols. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014; 93(22):e92. PMC: 4616317. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000092. View

Zhang L, Qi L, Wang J, Xiang Tang C, Zhou C, Ji X . Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(7):1537-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3157-2. View

Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Leschka S, Schmidt B, Falk V . Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol. 2012; 48(1):32-40. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318274cf82. View

Wyler von Ballmoos M, Haring B, Juillerat P, Alkadhi H . Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154(6):413-20. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00007. View

Cao J, Wang Y, Lu J, Zhang Y, Wang P, Yang C . Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparative study. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 83(2):309-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.032. View

Komatsu S, Kamata T, Imai A, Ohara T, Takewa M, Ohe R . Coronary computed tomography angiography using ultra-low-dose contrast media: radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29(6):1335-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0201-2. View

10.

Lell M, Jost G, Korporaal J, Mahnken A, Flohr T, Uder M . Optimizing contrast media injection protocols in state-of-the art computed tomographic angiography. Invest Radiol. 2014; 50(3):161-7. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000119. View

11.

Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss C . Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2007; 29(2):191-7. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm613. View

12.

Kok M, Mihl C, Hendriks B, Altintas S, Kietselaer B, Wildberger J . Optimizing contrast media application in coronary CT angiography at lower tube voltage: Evaluation in a circulation phantom and sixty patients. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(6):1068-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.022. View

13.

Murakami Y, Kakeda S, Kamada K, Ohnari N, Nishimura J, Ogawa M . Effect of tube voltage on image quality in 64-section multidetector 3D CT angiography: Evaluation with a vascular phantom with superimposed bone skull structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 31(4):620-5. PMC: 7964227. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1871. View

14.

Mitchell A, Jones A, Tumlin J, Kline J . Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19(6):618-25. PMC: 5366244. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01374.x. View

15.

Maron D, Hochman J, Reynolds H, Bangalore S, OBrien S, Boden W . Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15):1395-1407. PMC: 7263833. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. View

16.

McCollough C, Primak A, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J . Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009; 47(1):27-40. PMC: 2743386. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006. View