» Articles » PMID: 35136388

Effectiveness of Peri-Discharge Complex Interventions for Reducing 30-Day Readmissions Among COPD Patients: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2022 Feb 9
PMID 35136388
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: An overview of systematic reviews(SRs) and network meta-analysis(NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of peri-discharge complex interventions for reducing 30-day readmissions among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) patients.

Methods: Five databases were searched for SRs of randomized controlled trials(RCTs). An additional search was conducted for updated RCTs from database inception until Jun 2020. Pooled effect of peri-discharge complex interventions was assessed using random-effect pairwise meta-analyses. Comparative effectiveness across different peri-discharge complex interventions was evaluated using NMA.

Results: Nine SRs and 11 eligible RCTs(n = 1,422) assessing eight different peri-discharge complex interventions were included. For reducing 30-day all-cause readmissions, pairwise meta-analysis showed no significant difference between peri-discharge complex interventions and usual care, while NMA indicated no significant differences among different peri-discharge complex interventions as well as usual care. For reducing 30-day COPD-related readmissions, peri-discharge complex interventions were significantly more effective than usual care (pooled RR = 0.45, 95% CI:0.24-0.84).

Conclusions: Peri-discharge complex interventions may not differ from usual care in reducing 30-day all-cause readmissions among COPD patients but some are more effective for lowering 30-day COPD-related readmission. Thus, complex intervention comprising core components of patient education, self-management, patient-centred discharge instructions, and telephone follow up may be considered for implementation, but further evaluation is warranted.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of patients who return to the emergency department after an observation-unit assessment.

Hahn B, Sunny S, Kettyle P, Chacko J, Stefanov D Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024; 11(4):349-357.

PMID: 38778494 PMC: 11700688. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.192.


Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Interventions for Reducing Avoidable Hospital Readmission: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Fu B, Zhong C, Wong C, Ho F, Nilsen P, Hung C Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023; 12:7089.

PMID: 37579466 PMC: 10125127. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089.

References
1.
Walters J, Cameron-Tucker H, Courtney-Pratt H, Nelson M, Robinson A, Scott J . Supporting health behaviour change in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with telephone health-mentoring: insights from a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2012; 13:55. PMC: 3411441. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-55. View

2.
Ospina M, Michas M, Deuchar L, Leigh R, Bhutani M, Rowe B . Development of a patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018; 5(1):e000265. PMC: 5812389. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000265. View

3.
Mills E, Thorlund K, Ioannidis J . Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013; 346:f2914. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2914. View

4.
Mistiaen P, Poot E . Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (4):CD004510. PMC: 6823218. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004510.pub3. View

5.
Wilson J, ONeill B, Reilly J, Macmahon J, Bradley J . Education in pulmonary rehabilitation: the patient's perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(12):1704-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.040. View