» Articles » PMID: 35135653

Effectiveness of Selective Digestive Decolonization Therapy Using Oral Gentamicin for Eradication of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Carriage

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of selective digestive decolonization (SDD) therapy using oral gentamicin against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) colonization and to compare the incidence of novel gentamicin resistance between SDD and non-SDD patient groups.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Acute-care referral center hospital in South Korea.

Methods: Adults aged ≥20 years identified as rectal CRE carriers hospitalized between October 2019 and June 2020 were enrolled. Patients with a <30-day follow-up were excluded. Among CRE carriers, those who received 80 mg oral gentamicin sulfate (Shin Poong Pharmaceutical, Seoul, South Korea) 4 times daily comprised the SDD group and those who did not receive SDD therapy comprised the non-SDD group. CRE decolonization was compared between groups within 15 days, and new gentamicin resistance was assessed.

Results: In total, 73 rectal CRE carriers were identified; 11 patients were lost to follow-up within 30 days and were excluded. Oral gentamicin was administered to 20 of 62 patients. We detected no differences in the basic demographic features between groups. The rate of decolonization within 15 days was higher in the SDD group than in the non-SDD group (70.0% vs 23.8%; = .001). The time to decolonization was significantly shorter in the SDD group. We detected no difference in acquisition of new gentamicin resistance between the groups. No serious adverse events due to oral gentamicin SDD therapy were reported.

Conclusions: SDD therapy using oral gentamicin for CRE-colonized patients may be effective for the decolonization of gut CRE and for the prevention of transmission and subsequent CRE infection.

Citing Articles

Structural Equation Modelling as a Proof-of-Concept Tool for Mediation Mechanisms Between Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Six Types of Blood Stream Infection Among ICU Patients.

Hurley J Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596789 PMC: 11591272. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13111096.


Decolonization strategies for ESBL-producing or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales carriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang H, Wang H, Tian F, Yang C, Zhao M, Ding Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24349.

PMID: 39420082 PMC: 11487172. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75791-6.

References
1.
Ben-David D, Kordevani R, Keller N, Tal I, Marzel A, Gal-Mor O . Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 18(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03478.x. View

2.
Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L . Global spread of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(10):1791-8. PMC: 3310682. DOI: 10.3201/eid1710.110655. View

3.
Lubbert C, Faucheux S, Becker-Rux D, Laudi S, Durrbeck A, Busch T . Rapid emergence of secondary resistance to gentamicin and colistin following selective digestive decontamination in patients with KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a single-centre experience. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013; 42(6):565-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.008. View

4.
Tascini C, Sbrana F, Flammini S, Tagliaferri E, Arena F, Leonildi A . Oral gentamicin gut decontamination for prevention of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: relevance of concomitant systemic antibiotic therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58(4):1972-6. PMC: 4023775. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02283-13. View

5.
McConville T, Sullivan S, Gomez-Simmonds A, Whittier S, Uhlemann A . Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization (CRE) and subsequent risk of infection and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients, an observational study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186195. PMC: 5638409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186195. View