» Articles » PMID: 35133851

Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties

Overview
Journal Am J Audiol
Date 2022 Feb 8
PMID 35133851
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Hearing aids are the primary method to manage hearing loss. However, there are limited recommendations for when and how to set advanced hearing aid features. The purpose of this study is to describe how hearing aid features are utilized in clinically fit devices and to evaluate the relationship between the fitted hearing aid feature and the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test (QuickSIN).

Method: Data from two laboratories were evaluated retrospectively, resulting in 107 bilateral hearing aid participants who obtained their hearing aids at clinics in their communities. Ages ranged from 60 to 93 years. Degree of speech-in-noise difficulty was evaluated using the QuickSIN (mild, moderate, or severe). Settings for directionality, digital noise reduction (DNR), and hearing assistive technology (HAT) use were documented. Directionality was categorized as omnidirectional, fixed (full-time directional), or adaptive (adjusts automatically based on noise source). DNR was recorded as either on or off. HAT use was recorded as either yes or no.

Results: QuickSIN scores ranged from -1.5 to 25 dB SNR loss ( = 7). A moderate correlation was determined for QuickSIN scores and pure-tone averages. Adaptive directionality was used most often, most participants had DNR turned on, and HAT use was low. The biggest contributions to the Chi-square test for directionality and degrees of speech-in-noise difficulty together were fixed/severe, fixed/moderate, and adaptive/mild.

Conclusions: In this clinical sample, there was limited HAT use and advanced features are not set in a way that is consistent with speech-in-noise abilities. It is likely that patients fit with noise management that is not suited to their listening abilities are experiencing increased difficulties in challenging listening environments that could potentially be mitigated with alternative management. Evidence-based research on prefitting measures of speech in noise to help inform patient-centered clinical decisions is needed.

Citing Articles

The effect of speech masking on the human subcortical response to continuous speech.

Polonenko M, Maddox R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713441 PMC: 11661217. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.10.627771.


Hearing Function Moderates Age-Related Differences in Brain Morphometry in the HCP Aging Cohort.

Kirschen R, Leaver A Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(16):e70074.

PMID: 39540247 PMC: 11561423. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70074.


Improving speech intelligibility in noise and spatial perception: the critical role of hearing aid microphone position.

Kara E, Ozal N, Deniz B, Cogen T, Deniz R, Aydin K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1475122.

PMID: 39524029 PMC: 11543641. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1475122.


Hearing function moderates age-related changes in brain morphometry in the HCP Aging cohort.

Kirschen R, Leaver A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38712119 PMC: 11071358. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.22.590589.


A review of auditory processing and cognitive change during normal ageing, and the implications for setting hearing aids for older adults.

Windle R, Dillon H, Heinrich A Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1122420.

PMID: 37409017 PMC: 10318159. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122420.


References
1.
Picou E, Moore T, Ricketts T . The Effects of Directional Processing on Objective and Subjective Listening Effort. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60(1):199-211. DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0416. View

2.
Kim J, Kim C . A review of assistive listening device and digital wireless technology for hearing instruments. Korean J Audiol. 2015; 18(3):105-11. PMC: 4285000. DOI: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.105. View

3.
Gioia C, Ben-Akiva M, Kirkegaard M, Jorgensen O, Jensen K, Schum D . Case factors affecting hearing aid recommendations by hearing care professionals. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015; 26(3):229-46. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.4. View

4.
Hartley D, Rochtchina E, Newall P, Golding M, Mitchell P . Use of hearing AIDS and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011; 21(10):642-53. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.10.4. View

5.
Browning J, Buss E, Flaherty M, Vallier T, Leibold L . Effects of Adaptive Hearing Aid Directionality and Noise Reduction on Masked Speech Recognition for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. Am J Audiol. 2019; 28(1):101-113. DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0045. View