» Articles » PMID: 35131904

Immunophenotyping of Inclusion Body Myositis Blood T and NK Cells

Abstract

Background And Objectives: To evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting highly differentiated T cells in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM) by establishing high-resolution mapping of killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G member 1 (KLRG1) within the T and natural killer (NK) cell compartments.

Methods: Blood was collected from 51 patients with IBM and 19 healthy age-matched donors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were interrogated by flow cytometry using a 12-marker antibody panel. The panel allowed the delineation of naive T cells (Tn), central memory T cells (Tcm), 4 stages of effector memory differentiation T cells (Tem 1-4), and effector memory re-expressing CD45RA T cells (TemRA), as well as total and subpopulations of NK cells based on the differential expression of CD16 and C56.

Results: We found that a population of KLRG1 Tem and TemRA were expanded in both the CD4 and CD8 T-cell subpopulations in patients with IBM. KLRG1 expression in CD8 T cells increased with T-cell differentiation with the lowest levels of expression in Tn and highest in highly differentiated TemRA and CD56CD8 T cells. The frequency of KLRG1 total NK cells and subpopulations did not differ between patients with IBM and healthy donors. IBM disease duration correlated with increased CD8 T-cell differentiation.

Discussion: Our findings reveal that the selective expansion of blood KLRG1 T cells in patients with IBM is confined to the TemRA and Tem cellular compartments.

Citing Articles

Inclusion body myositis and immunosenescence: current evidence and future perspectives.

Allameen N, Salam S, Reddy V, Machado P Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024; 64(3):952-961.

PMID: 39504446 PMC: 11879327. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae614.


Sporadic inclusion body myositis-derived myotube culture revealed muscle cell-autonomous expression profiles.

Suzuki N, Kanzaki M, Koide M, Izumi R, Fujita R, Takahashi T PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0306021.

PMID: 39088432 PMC: 11293708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306021.


The role of KLRG1: a novel biomarker and new therapeutic target.

Zhang Y, Chen S, Tang X, Peng Y, Jiang T, Zhang X Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):337.

PMID: 38898461 PMC: 11186184. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01714-7.


Inclusion body myositis, viral infections, and TDP-43: a narrative review.

Vacaras V, Vulturar R, Chis A, Damian L Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):91.

PMID: 38693436 PMC: 11062973. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01353-9.


Identification of distinct immune signatures in inclusion body myositis by peripheral blood immunophenotyping using machine learning models.

McLeish E, Sooda A, Slater N, Beer K, Cooper I, Mastaglia F Clin Transl Immunology. 2024; 13(4):e1504.

PMID: 38585335 PMC: 10990804. DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1504.


References
1.
Pandya J, Fasth A, Zong M, Arnardottir S, Dani L, Lindroos E . Expanded T cell receptor Vβ-restricted T cells from patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis are proinflammatory and cytotoxic CD28null T cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(11):3457-66. DOI: 10.1002/art.27665. View

2.
Schmidt J, Dalakas M . Inclusion body myositis: from immunopathology and degenerative mechanisms to treatment perspectives. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2013; 9(11):1125-33. DOI: 10.1586/1744666X.2013.842467. View

3.
Kelly-Rogers J, Madrigal-Estebas L, OConnor T, Doherty D . Activation-induced expression of CD56 by T cells is associated with a reprogramming of cytolytic activity and cytokine secretion profile in vitro. Hum Immunol. 2006; 67(11):863-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.08.292. View

4.
Mastaglia F, Needham M . Inclusion body myositis: a review of clinical and genetic aspects, diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 22(1):6-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.012. View

5.
Van Acker H, Capsomidis A, Smits E, Van Tendeloo V . CD56 in the Immune System: More Than a Marker for Cytotoxicity?. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:892. PMC: 5522883. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00892. View