» Articles » PMID: 35131206

Physical Activity Intensity Profiles Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk in Middle-aged to Older Men and Women

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Feb 8
PMID 35131206
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accelerometers provide detailed data about physical activity (PA) across the full intensity spectrum. However, when examining associations with health, results are often aggregated to only a few summary measures [e.g. time spent "sedentary" or "moderate-to-vigorous" intensity PA]. Using multivariate pattern analysis, which can handle collinear exposure variables, we examined associations between the full PA intensity spectrum and cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in a population-based sample of middle-aged to older adults. Participants (n = 3660; mean ± SD age = 69 ± 8y and BMI = 26.7 ± 4.2 kg/m; 55% female) from the EPIC-Norfolk study (UK) with valid accelerometry (ActiGraph-GT1M) data were included. We used multivariate pattern analysis with partial least squares regression to examine cross-sectional multivariate associations (r) across the full PA intensity spectrum [minutes/day at 0-5000 counts-per-minute (cpm); 5 s epoch] with a continuous CMR score (reflecting waist, blood pressure, lipid, and glucose metabolism). Models were sex-stratified and adjusted for potential confounders. There was a positive (detrimental) association between PA and CMR at 0-12 cpm (maximally-adjusted r = 0.08 (95%CI 0.06-0.10). PA was negatively (favourably) associated with CMR at all intensities above 13 cpm ranging between r = -0.09 (0.07-0.12) at 800-999 cpm and r = -0.14 (0.11-0.16) at 75-99 and 4000-4999 cpm. The strongest favourable associations were from 50 to 800 cpm (r = 0.10-0.12) in men, but from ≥2500 cpm (r = 0.18-0.20) in women; with higher proportions of model explained variance for women (R = 7.4% vs. 2.3%). Most of the PA intensity spectrum was beneficially associated with CMR in middle-aged to older adults, even at intensities lower than what has traditionally been considered "sedentary" or "light-intensity" activity. This supports encouragement of PA at almost any intensity in this age-group.

Citing Articles

Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study.

Ustad A, Sverdrup K, Tangen G, Dohl O, Vereijken B, Thingstad P Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):20.

PMID: 39014310 PMC: 11253329. DOI: 10.1186/s11556-024-00355-6.


Fitness-related physical activity intensity explains most of the association between accelerometer data and cardiometabolic health in persons 50-64 years old.

Fridolfsson J, Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom O, Bergstrom G, Arvidsson D, Borjesson M Br J Sports Med. 2024; 58(21):1244-1250.

PMID: 38997147 PMC: 11671887. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107451.


Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-measured physical activity with incident coronary artery disease in the UK biobank cohort.

Schell R, Dow W, Fernald L, Bradshaw P, Rehkopf D PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0304653.

PMID: 38870224 PMC: 11175526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304653.


Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity, Fitness and Indicators of Cardiometabolic Risk among Rural Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study at 15-Year Follow-up of the MINIMat Cohort.

Islam M, Nystrom C, Kippler M, Kajantie E, Lof M, Rahman S J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024; 14(3):987-1003.

PMID: 38771489 PMC: 11442897. DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00245-1.


Activity Behaviors Before and During Pregnancy Are Associated With Women's Device-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Later Parenthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis.

Hesketh K, Baird J, Crozier S, Godfrey K, Harvey N, Cooper C J Phys Act Health. 2023; 20(9):803-811.

PMID: 37573030 PMC: 7615174. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0630.


References
1.
Cain K, Conway T, Adams M, Husak L, Sallis J . Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:51. PMC: 3641979. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-51. View

2.
Orme M, Wijndaele K, Sharp S, Westgate K, Ekelund U, Brage S . Combined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11(1):34. PMC: 4008000. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-34. View

3.
Aadland E, Kvalheim O, Anderssen S, Resaland G, Andersen L . The Triaxial Physical Activity Signature Associated with Metabolic Health in Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(10):2173-2179. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002021. View

4.
Rantalainen T, Ridgers N, Gao Y, Belavy D, Haapala E, Finni T . Physical activity accumulation along the intensity spectrum differs between children and adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021; 121(9):2563-2571. PMC: 8357734. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04731-3. View

5.
Bingham S, Welch A, McTaggart A, Mulligan A, Runswick S, Luben R . Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4(3):847-58. DOI: 10.1079/phn2000102. View