Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Date 2022 Feb 7

PMID 35127665

Authors

Ayleen Bertini

Rodrigo Salas

Steren Chabert

Luis Sobrevia

Fabian Pardo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is widely used in medical field, and machine learning has been increasingly used in health care, prediction, and diagnosis and as a method of determining priority. Machine learning methods have been features of several tools in the fields of obstetrics and childcare. This present review aims to summarize the machine learning techniques to predict perinatal complications. To identify the applicability and performance of machine learning methods used to identify pregnancy complications. A total of 98 articles were obtained with the keywords "machine learning," "deep learning," "artificial intelligence," and accordingly as they related to perinatal complications ("complications in pregnancy," "pregnancy complications") from three scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. These were managed on the Mendeley platform and classified using the PRISMA method. A total of 31 articles were selected after elimination according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The features used to predict perinatal complications were primarily electronic medical records (48%), medical images (29%), and biological markers (19%), while 4% were based on other types of features, such as sensors and fetal heart rate. The main perinatal complications considered in the application of machine learning thus far are pre-eclampsia and prematurity. In the 31 studies, a total of sixteen complications were predicted. The main precision metric used is the AUC. The machine learning methods with the best results were the prediction of prematurity from medical images using the support vector machine technique, with an accuracy of 95.7%, and the prediction of neonatal mortality with the XGBoost technique, with 99.7% accuracy. It is important to continue promoting this area of research and promote solutions with multicenter clinical applicability through machine learning to reduce perinatal complications. This systematic review contributes significantly to the specialized literature on artificial intelligence and women's health.

Citing Articles

Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases.

de Morais F, da Silva Rocha E, Masson G, do Nascimento Filho D, Maria Mendes K, de Sousa Dourado R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):207.

PMID: 40011804 PMC: 11863662. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07303-x.

Prediction Models for Late-Onset Preeclampsia: A Study Based on Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting Models.

Zhang Y, Gu X, Yang N, Xue Y, Ma L, Wang Y Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002760 PMC: 11853338. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020347.

Identification of genes involved in energy metabolism in preeclampsia and discovery of early biomarkers.

Li R, Zhou C, Ye K, Chen H, Peng M Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1496046.

PMID: 39967661 PMC: 11832505. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1496046.

Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes using machine learning techniques: evidence from analysis of electronic medical records data in Rwanda.

Sylvain M, Nyabyenda E, Uwase M, Komezusenge I, Ndikumana F, Ngaruye I BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):76.

PMID: 39939998 PMC: 11823242. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02921-z.

An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.

Owusu-Adjei M, Ben Hayfron-Acquah J, Frimpong T, Gaddafi A PLOS Digit Health. 2025; 4(2):e0000543.

PMID: 39908236 PMC: 11798466. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000543.

References

Jhee J, Lee S, Park Y, Lee S, Kim Y, Kang S . Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221202. PMC: 6707607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221202. View

Liu K, Fu Q, Liu Y, Wang C . An integrative bioinformatics analysis of microarray data for identifying hub genes as diagnostic biomarkers of preeclampsia. Biosci Rep. 2019; 39(9). PMC: 6722495. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190187. View

Rittenhouse K, Vwalika B, Keil A, Winston J, Stoner M, Price J . Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0198919. PMC: 6392324. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198919. View

Hamilton E, Dyachenko A, Ciampi A, Maurel K, Warrick P, Garite T . Estimating risk of severe neonatal morbidity in preterm births under 32 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 33(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1487395. View

Obermeyer Z, Emanuel E . Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(13):1216-9. PMC: 5070532. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1606181. View

Pan I, Nolan L, Brown R, Khan R, van der Boor P, Harris D . Machine Learning for Social Services: A Study of Prenatal Case Management in Illinois. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(6):938-944. PMC: 5425855. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303711. View

Darcy A, Louie A, Roberts L . Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine. JAMA. 2016; 315(6):551-2. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18421. View

Malacova E, Tippaya S, Bailey H, Chai K, Farrant B, Gebremedhin A . Stillbirth risk prediction using machine learning for a large cohort of births from Western Australia, 1980-2015. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):5354. PMC: 7093523. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62210-9. View

Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Muller H . Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2020; 9(4):e1312. PMC: 7017860. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1312. View

10.

Vayena E, Blasimme A, Cohen I . Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(11):e1002689. PMC: 6219763. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. View

11.

Chen L, Hao Y, Hu X . Detection of preterm birth in electrohysterogram signals based on wavelet transform and stacked sparse autoencoder. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0214712. PMC: 6467380. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214712. View

12.

Guo Z, Yang F, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Li K, Tian Q . Whole-Genome Promoter Profiling of Plasma DNA Exhibits Diagnostic Value for Placenta-Origin Pregnancy Complications. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020; 7(7):1901819. PMC: 7141029. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201901819. View

13.

Makary M, Daniel M . Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016; 353:i2139. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2139. View

14.

Hinton G . Deep Learning-A Technology With the Potential to Transform Health Care. JAMA. 2018; 320(11):1101-1102. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.11100. View

15.

Chiera M, Cerritelli F, Casini A, Barsotti N, Boschiero D, Cavigioli F . Heart Rate Variability in the Perinatal Period: A Critical and Conceptual Review. Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:561186. PMC: 7544983. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.561186. View

16.

Ho C, Soon D, Caals K, Kapur J . Governance of automated image analysis and artificial intelligence analytics in healthcare. Clin Radiol. 2019; 74(5):329-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.005. View

17.

McCormick M, Litt J, Smith V, Zupancic J . Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011; 32:367-79. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090810-182459. View

18.

Boland M, Polubriaginof F, Tatonetti N . Development of A Machine Learning Algorithm to Classify Drugs Of Unknown Fetal Effect. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):12839. PMC: 5634437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12943-x. View

19.

Shigemi D, Yamaguchi S, Aso S, Yasunaga H . Predictive model for macrosomia using maternal parameters without sonography information. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 32(22):3859-3863. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1484090. View

20.

Gao C, Osmundson S, Yan X, Edwards D, Malin B, Chen Y . Learning to Identify Severe Maternal Morbidity from Electronic Health Records. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019; 264:143-147. PMC: 7337420. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI190200. View