» Articles » PMID: 35125004

Hominin Evolution and Diversity: a Comparison of Earlier-Middle and Later-Middle Pleistocene Hominin Fossil Variation in China

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 7
PMID 35125004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Historical views of Asia as an evolutionary 'backwater' are associated with the idea that experienced long periods of stasis and ultimately went extinct. However, recent discoveries of well-dated Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils in China have considerably challenged these ideas and provide sufficient data to propose a testable model that explains the patterning of variation in Middle Pleistocene China, and why it changed over time. A series of hominin fossil studies comparing earlier-Middle and later-Middle Pleistocene groups confirm that the expressions of certain traits shift around 300 ka. Fossils from the later Middle Pleistocene are more variable with a mix of archaic traits as well as ones that are common in Western Eurasian early and Neanderthals. The period around 300 ka appears to have been a critical turning point for later-Middle Pleistocene morphological changes in China. It coincides with a phase of climatic instability in the Northern Hemisphere between Marine Isotope Stages 12 and 10 that would have led to changes in gene flow patterning, and regional population survival/extinction. This localized and testable model can be used for future explorations of hominin evolution in later Pleistocene eastern Eurasia. This article is part of the theme issue 'The impact of Chinese palaeontology on evolutionary research'.

Citing Articles

Impact of Chinese palaeontology on evolutionary research.

Ma X, Wang G, Wang M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1847):20210029.

PMID: 35124998 PMC: 8819365. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0029.

References
1.
Chen F, Welker F, Shen C, Bailey S, Bergmann I, Davis S . A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau. Nature. 2019; 569(7756):409-412. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1139-x. View

2.
Rosenberg K, Zune L, Ruff C . Body size, body proportions, and encephalization in a Middle Pleistocene archaic human from northern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(10):3552-6. PMC: 1450121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508681103. View

3.
Kolbe J, Glor R, Schettino L, Lara A, Larson A, Losos J . Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature. 2004; 431(7005):177-81. DOI: 10.1038/nature02807. View

4.
Swisher 3rd C, Rink W, Anton S, Schwarcz H, CURTIS G, Suprijo A . Latest Homo erectus of Java: potential contemporaneity with Homo sapiens in southeast Asia. Science. 1996; 274(5294):1870-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1870. View

5.
Baab K . The taxonomic implications of cranial shape variation in Homo erectus. J Hum Evol. 2008; 54(6):827-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.11.003. View