» Articles » PMID: 3511648

Systematic Correlation of Continuous-wave Doppler and Hemodynamic Measurements in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Overview
Journal Am Heart J
Date 1986 Feb 1
PMID 3511648
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of pressure gradients obtained from continuous-wave (CW) Doppler recordings with direct pressure measurements derived from cardiac catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis. Forty patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for evaluation of aortic stenosis were prospectively studied with CW Doppler spectral recordings of the aortic valve prior to catheterization. Thirty-three patients underwent a second Doppler examination simultaneously with pressure recordings in the catheterization laboratory. Nineteen of the patients had catheterization pressures measured using high-fidelity, micromanometer-tip catheters. Doppler and pressure tracings were digitized using a microprocessor-based computer with a software program which allowed for calculation of maximal instantaneous, mean, and peak-to-peak gradients, plus ejection and acceleration times. Maximal instantaneous gradient by CW Doppler showed an excellent correlation with maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient (r = 0.93, SEE = 9 mm Hg). The correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler gradient with peak-to-peak catheterization gradient was also linear (r = 0.85, SEE = 12 mm Hg), but there was a consistent overestimation of peak-to-peak gradient in 38 of 40 cases (mean = 17 mm Hg). Mean gradient as calculated by the two techniques correlated best of all measurements performed (r = 0.95, SEE = 6 mm Hg). When patients were grouped into subsets of mild (0 to 25 mm Hg), moderate (25 to 50 mm Hg), and severe (greater than 50 mm Hg) levels of stenosis, the correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler and peak-to-peak catheterization gradients were r = 0.22, 0.44, and 0.77, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Non-invasive myocardial work in aortic stenosis: validation and improvement in left ventricular pressure estimation.

Ribic D, Remme E, Smiseth O, Massey R, Eek C, Kvitting J Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 25(2):201-212.

PMID: 37672652 PMC: 10824486. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead227.


The quest for the unholy grail.

Kimball T Pediatr Cardiol. 2008; 29(3):481-3.

PMID: 18398635 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-008-9217-0.


Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Vlahos A, Marx G, McElhinney D, ONeill S, Goudevenos I, Colan S Pediatr Cardiol. 2007; 29(3):507-14.

PMID: 18080153 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-007-9169-9.


Influence of stenotic valve geometry on measured pressure gradients and ventricular work: the relationship between morphology and flow.

Cape E, Kelly D, Ettedgui J, Park S Pediatr Cardiol. 1996; 17(3):155-62.

PMID: 8662024 DOI: 10.1007/BF02505205.


[Percutaneous transfemoral valvuloplasty in patients with calcified aortic stenosis and significantly increased surgical risk: clinical course and value of Doppler sonography in assessment of therapeutic success].

Kucherer H, Katus H, Dietz R, Rauch B, Kubler W Klin Wochenschr. 1988; 66(13):571-8.

PMID: 3210654 DOI: 10.1007/BF01720831.