The Selection Force Weakens with Age Because Ageing Evolves and Not Vice Versa

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2022 Feb 4

PMID 35115526

Authors

Stefano Giaimo

Arne Traulsen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

According to the classic theory of life history evolution, ageing evolves because selection on traits necessarily weakens throughout reproductive life. But this inexorable decline of the selection force with adult age was shown to crucially depend on specific assumptions that are not necessarily fulfilled. Whether ageing still evolves upon their relaxation remains an open problem. Here, we propose a fully dynamical model of life history evolution that does not presuppose any specific pattern the force of selection should follow. The model shows: (i) ageing can stably evolve, but negative ageing cannot; (ii) when ageing is a stable equilibrium, the associated selection force decreases with reproductive age; (iii) non-decreasing selection is either a transient or an unstable phenomenon. Thus, we generalize the classic theory of the evolution of ageing while overturning its logic: the decline of selection with age evolves dynamically, and is not an implicit consequence of certain assumptions.

Citing Articles

Molecular mechanisms of aging and anti-aging strategies.

Li Y, Tian X, Luo J, Bao T, Wang S, Wu X Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):285.

PMID: 38790068 PMC: 11118732. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01663-1.

Directional selection coupled with kin selection favors the establishment of senescence.

Szilagyi A, Czaran T, Santos M, Szathmary E BMC Biol. 2023; 21(1):230.

PMID: 37867189 PMC: 10591417. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01716-w.

Investigation of Pancreatic-beta Cells Role in the Biological Process of Ageing.

Chaudhary R, Khanna J, Rohilla M, Gupta S, Bansal S Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023; 24(3):348-362.

PMID: 37608675 DOI: 10.2174/1871530323666230822095932.

Expanding evolutionary theories of ageing to better account for symbioses and interactions throughout the Web of Life.

Bapteste E, Huneman P, Keller L, Teuliere J, Lopez P, Teeling E Ageing Res Rev. 2023; 89:101982.

PMID: 37321383 PMC: 10771319. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101982.

Host developmental stages shape the evolution of a plant RNA virus.

Melero I, Gonzalez R, Elena S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1873):20220005.

PMID: 36744567 PMC: 9979778. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0005.

References

Wachter K, Evans S, Steinsaltz D . The age-specific force of natural selection and biodemographic walls of death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(25):10141-6. PMC: 3690893. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1306656110. View

Pletcher S, Houle D, Curtsinger J . Age-specific properties of spontaneous mutations affecting mortality in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1998; 148(1):287-303. PMC: 1459779. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.287. View

Turelli M . PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, CONSTANT COVARIANCES, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ADDITIVE VARIANCE. Evolution. 2017; 42(6):1342-1347. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04193.x. View

Promislow D . SENESCENCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF MAMMALS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Evolution. 2017; 45(8):1869-1887. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02693.x. View

Durham M, Magwire M, Stone E, Leips J . Genome-wide analysis in Drosophila reveals age-specific effects of SNPs on fitness traits. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4338. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5338. View

Day T, Abrams P . Density Dependence, Senescence, and Williams' Hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020; 35(4):300-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.005. View

Wensink M . Age-specificity and the evolution of senescence: a discussion. Biogerontology. 2012; 14(1):99-105. PMC: 3627019. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-012-9410-7. View

Vaupel J, Baudisch A, Dolling M, Roach D, Gampe J . The case for negative senescence. Theor Popul Biol. 2004; 65(4):339-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.12.003. View

Leips J, Gilligan P, Mackay T . Quantitative trait loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2005; 172(3):1595-605. PMC: 1456283. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.048520. View

10.

Baudisch A . Hamilton's indicators of the force of selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(23):8263-8. PMC: 1140481. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502155102. View

11.

Caswell H, Salguero-Gomez R . Age, stage and senescence in plants. J Ecol. 2013; 101(3):585-595. PMC: 3664411. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12088. View

12.

Williams P, Day T, Fletcher Q, Rowe L . The shaping of senescence in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 21(8):458-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.008. View

13.

Williams G . The 1999 Crafoord Prize lectures. The Tithonus error in modern gerontology. Q Rev Biol. 2000; 74(4):405-15. DOI: 10.1086/394111. View

14.

Kozlowski J . Measuring fitness in life,,history studies. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 8(3):84-5. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90056-U. View

15.

Moorad J, Promislow D, Silvertown J . Evolutionary Ecology of Senescence and a Reassessment of Williams' 'Extrinsic Mortality' Hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 34(6):519-530. PMC: 6746179. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.006. View

16.

Hughes B, Hekimi S . Different Mechanisms of Longevity in Long-Lived Mouse and Caenorhabditis elegans Mutants Revealed by Statistical Analysis of Mortality Rates. Genetics. 2016; 204(3):905-920. PMC: 5105868. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.192369. View

17.

Wachter K, Steinsaltz D, Evans S . Evolutionary shaping of demographic schedules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111 Suppl 3:10846-53. PMC: 4113925. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400841111. View

18.

Hamilton W . The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol. 1966; 12(1):12-45. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6. View

19.

Houle D, Hughes K, Hoffmaster D, Ihara J, Assimacopoulos S, Canada D . The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics. 1994; 138(3):773-85. PMC: 1206226. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.773. View

20.

Charlesworth B . Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing. J Theor Biol. 2001; 210(1):47-65. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2296. View