Use of YouTube As an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?

Overview

Journal Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther

Date 2022 Feb 4

PMID 35114751

Authors

Huseyin San

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a radionuclide treatment for hyperthyroidism and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. One of the most popular sources of information for patients on the internet is YouTube. This study aimed to examine the quality of videos about RAI treatment.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed by using videos in YouTube. The terms "radyoaktif iyot tedavisi" and "radioactive iodine treatment" were used to search related videos in June 2021. The quality of the videos was assessed by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the DISCERN scale, and the global quality scale (GQS).

Results: Of the total 88 videos evaluated, 56 videos (30 in English, 26 in Turkish) were analyzed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven (12.5%) videos were assigned to the high-quality group, 16 (28.58%) to the intermediate quality group, and 33 (58.92%) to the low quality group. The findings of this study showed that the most popular videos with the highest video power index (VPI) scores and the highest number of video likes and comments belonged to the intermediate quality group. Contrarily, popularity level, number of video likes, and number of video views were the lowest in the high-quality group. The analysis of video sources revealed that viewers most preferred non-physician-sourced videos, with average total views of 59307.80 [standard deviation (SD): 122554.13]. The most liked videos were non-physician-made videos, with average total likes of 424.35 (SD: 639.41). The mean VPI scores were the highest in non-physician-made videos, with 25.18 (SD: 25.69). The average JAMA (1.92, SD: 0.50), DISCERN (34.31, SD: 14.33), and GQS scores (2.61, SD: 0.99) were the highest in physician-made videos.

Conclusion: Although high-quality videos on YouTube may inform and encourage patients positively, unprofessional, incorrect, and incomplete information can be also uploaded on YouTube and may mislead patients.

Citing Articles

A Novel Approach: Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility for the Management of Thyroid Nodules.

Koroglu E, Faki S, Bestepe N, Tam A, Cuhaci Seyrek N, Topaloglu O Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47576.

PMID: 38021609 PMC: 10666652. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47576.

Radionuclide Therapy Videos on YouTube as An Educational Material: Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed the Quality, Usefulness, and Interaction Features.

Korkmaz U, Soyluoglu S, Arda E Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; :1-7.

PMID: 37360576 PMC: 10073796. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-023-00799-1.

References

Kocyigit B, Nacitarhan V, Koca T, Berk E . YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. Clin Rheumatol. 2019; 38(6):1747-1751. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-04413-0. View

Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S . A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(9):2070-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x. View

Chalil Madathil K, Rivera-Rodriguez A, Greenstein J, Gramopadhye A . Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2014; 21(3):173-94. DOI: 10.1177/1460458213512220. View

Tolu S, Yurdakul O, Basaran B, Rezvani A . English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections. Rheumatol Int. 2018; 38(7):1285-1292. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4047-8. View

Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A . Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018; 4(1):e3. PMC: 5826977. DOI: 10.2196/mededu.8527. View

Yoon H, Jang Y, Vaughan P, Garcia M . Older Adults' Internet Use for Health Information: Digital Divide by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status. J Appl Gerontol. 2018; 39(1):105-110. DOI: 10.1177/0733464818770772. View

Silberg W, LUNDBERG G, Musacchio R . Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; 277(15):1244-5. View

Finney Rutten L, Squiers L, Hesse B . Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2006; 11 Suppl 1:147-56. DOI: 10.1080/10810730600637574. View

Ross D, Burch H, Cooper D, Greenlee M, Laurberg P, Maia A . 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016; 26(10):1343-1421. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2016.0229. View

10.

Atkinson N, Saperstein S, Pleis J . Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11(1):e4. PMC: 2762768. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1035. View

11.

CHARNOCK D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R . DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53(2):105-11. PMC: 1756830. DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105. View

12.

Haugen B, Alexander E, Bible K, Doherty G, Mandel S, Nikiforov Y . 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2015; 26(1):1-133. PMC: 4739132. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020. View