Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used As a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Technol

Publisher American Chemical Society

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2022 Feb 3

PMID 35113548

Authors

Peter B McMahon

Andrea K Tokranov

Laura M Bexfield

Bruce D Lindsey

Tyler D Johnson

Melissa A Lombard

Elise Watson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In 2019, 254 samples were collected from five aquifer systems to evaluate perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) occurrence in groundwater used as a source of drinking water in the eastern United States. The samples were analyzed for 24 PFAS, major ions, nutrients, trace elements, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pharmaceuticals, and tritium. Fourteen of the 24 PFAS were detected in groundwater, with 60 and 20% of public-supply and domestic wells, respectively, containing at least one PFAS detection. Concentrations of tritium, chloride, sulfate, DOC, and manganese + iron; percent urban land use within 500 m of the wells; and VOC and pharmaceutical detection frequencies were significantly higher in samples containing PFAS detections than in samples with no detections. Boosted regression tree models that consider 57 chemical and land-use variables show that tritium concentration, distance to the nearest fire-training area, percentage of urban land use, and DOC and VOC concentrations are the top five predictors of PFAS detections, consistent with the hydrologic position, geochemistry, and land use being important controls on PFAS occurrence in groundwater. Model results indicate that it may be possible to predict PFAS detections in groundwater using existing data sources.

Citing Articles

Sources and Pathways of PFAS Occurrence in Water Sources: Relative Contribution of Land-Applied Biosolids in an Agricultural Dominated Watershed.

Peter L, Lee L Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(2):1344-1353.

PMID: 39779456 PMC: 11874022. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09490.

Predicted Potential for Aquatic Exposure Effects of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) in Pennsylvania's Statewide Network of Streams.

Breitmeyer S, Williams A, Conlon M, Wertz T, Heflin B, Shull D Toxics. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39771136 PMC: 11728657. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12120921.

Occurrence, Fate, and Removal of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Small- and Large-Scale Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities in the United States.

Kim J, Xin X, Hawkins G, Huang Q, Huang C ACS ES T Water. 2024; 4(12):5428-5436.

PMID: 39698553 PMC: 11650586. DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c00541.

Cross-cutting studies of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in Arctic wildlife and humans.

Lohmann R, Abass K, Bonefeld-Jorgensen E, Bossi R, Dietz R, Ferguson S Sci Total Environ. 2024; 954:176274.

PMID: 39304148 PMC: 11567803. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176274.

A data-driven approach to identifying PFAS water sampling priorities in Colorado, United States.

Barton K, Anthamatten P, Adgate J, McKenzie L, Starling A, Berg K J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39090285 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-024-00705-7.

References

Kuroda K, Murakami M, Oguma K, Takada H, Takizawa S . Investigating sources and pathways of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in aquifers in Tokyo using multiple tracers. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 488-489:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.066. View

McGuire M, Schaefer C, Richards T, Backe W, Field J, Houtz E . Evidence of remediation-induced alteration of subsurface poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance distribution at a former firefighter training area. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(12):6644-52. DOI: 10.1021/es5006187. View

Goodrum P, Anderson J, Luz A, Ansell G . Application of a Framework for Grouping and Mixtures Toxicity Assessment of PFAS: A Closer Examination of Dose-Additivity Approaches. Toxicol Sci. 2020; 179(2):262-278. PMC: 7846094. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa123. View

Weber A, Barber L, LeBlanc D, Sunderland E, Vecitis C . Geochemical and Hydrologic Factors Controlling Subsurface Transport of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(8):4269-4279. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05573. View

Kothawala D, Kohler S, Ostlund A, Wiberg K, Ahrens L . Influence of dissolved organic matter concentration and composition on the removal efficiency of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) during drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2017; 121:320-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.047. View

Buck R, Franklin J, Berger U, Conder J, Cousins I, de Voogt P . Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011; 7(4):513-41. PMC: 3214619. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.258. View

Wang N, Liu J, Buck R, Korzeniowski S, Wolstenholme B, Folsom P . 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge of waste water treatment plants. Chemosphere. 2010; 82(6):853-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.003. View

Guo B, Zeng J, Brusseau M . A Mathematical Model for the Release, Transport, and Retention of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Vadose Zone. Water Resour Res. 2020; 56(2). PMC: 7673302. DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026667. View

Benskin J, Li B, Ikonomou M, Grace J, Li L . Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in landfill leachate: patterns, time trends, and sources. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(21):11532-40. DOI: 10.1021/es302471n. View

10.

Houtz E, Sedlak D . Oxidative conversion as a means of detecting precursors to perfluoroalkyl acids in urban runoff. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(17):9342-9. DOI: 10.1021/es302274g. View

11.

Prevedouros K, Cousins I, Buck R, Korzeniowski S . Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40(1):32-44. DOI: 10.1021/es0512475. View

12.

Du Z, Deng S, Bei Y, Huang Q, Wang B, Huang J . Adsorption behavior and mechanism of perfluorinated compounds on various adsorbents--a review. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 274:443-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.038. View

13.

Lombard M, Scannell Bryan M, Jones D, Bulka C, Bradley P, Backer L . Machine Learning Models of Arsenic in Private Wells Throughout the Conterminous United States As a Tool for Exposure Assessment in Human Health Studies. Environ Sci Technol. 2021; 55(8):5012-5023. PMC: 8852770. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05239. View

14.

Schaider L, Rudel R, Ackerman J, Dunagan S, Brody J . Pharmaceuticals, perfluorosurfactants, and other organic wastewater compounds in public drinking water wells in a shallow sand and gravel aquifer. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 468-469:384-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.067. View

15.

Sharma B, Bharat G, Tayal S, Larssen T, Becanova J, Karaskova P . Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in river and ground/drinking water of the Ganges River basin: Emissions and implications for human exposure. Environ Pollut. 2015; 208(Pt B):704-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.050. View

16.

Davis K, Aucoin M, Larsen B, Kaiser M, Hartten A . Transport of ammonium perfluorooctanoate in environmental media near a fluoropolymer manufacturing facility. Chemosphere. 2007; 67(10):2011-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.049. View

17.

Nolan B, Hitt K . Vulnerability of shallow groundwater and drinking-water wells to nitrate in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 40(24):7834-40. DOI: 10.1021/es060911u. View

18.

Murakami M, Kuroda K, Sato N, Fukushi T, Takizawa S, Takada H . Groundwater pollution by perfluorinated surfactants in Tokyo. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(10):3480-6. DOI: 10.1021/es803556w. View

19.

Zhao Q, Hastie T . CAUSAL INTERPRETATIONS OF BLACK-BOX MODELS. J Bus Econ Stat. 2020; 2019. PMC: 7597863. DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1624293. View

20.

Wang Z, DeWitt J, Higgins C, Cousins I . A Never-Ending Story of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)?. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(5):2508-2518. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04806. View