» Articles » PMID: 35106307

Development and Validation of Quantitative Thin Layer Chromatographic Technique for Determination of Total Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed and Food Grains Without Sample Clean-up

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 2
PMID 35106307
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this work is to develop and validate an appropriate solvent solution and quantitative thin layer chromatography (TLC) method for determining the aflatoxins content of chicken feeds and dietary grains.

Materials And Methods: To obtain the optimal mobile phase, samples were extracted with methanol/water (3:1) + 5% sodium chloride and partitioned using several solvent systems using preparative TLC. Camag TLC scanner 3 was used to scan the TLC plates at 366 nm and quantify them using JustTLC software. The method was tested for linearity, specificity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and robustness in accordance with ICH recommendations, and then utilized to screen 132 Nigerian poultry/food samples for total aflatoxins (TAFs).

Results: The best separation of aflatoxins was achieved using acetonitrile and dichloromethane (3:17) mobile phase over an average run time of 45 min, resulting in linear calibration curves ( > 0.99) in the concentration range limit of quantitation (LoQ) to 50 ng/spot with a limit of detection of <2.0 ng/g and a LoQ of <4.0 ng/gm for all aflatoxins in all spiked samples. When the proposed TLC method was compared to an optimized high-performance liquid chromatography method, an excellent linear regression was obtained ( > 95%). Seventy seven (58.33%) of the 132 samples examined were positive for aflatoxins, with mean values ranging from 3.57 ± 2.55 to 37.31 ± 34.06 ng/gm for aflatoxin B1 and 6.67 ± 0.00 to 38.02 ± 31.52 ng/gm for TAFs, respectively.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the feasibility of using the suggested TLC method in conjunction with a novel solvent solution (free of carcinogenic chloroform) for the rapid and accurate measurement of TAFs in foods/feeds.

Citing Articles

Nanobody and CuS Nanoflower-Au-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay Strip to Enhance the Detection of Aflatoxin B.

Zhao Y, He B, Li D, Gao L, Ren W Foods. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38928787 PMC: 11203097. DOI: 10.3390/foods13121845.


The Hydrophobic Extract of (L. Moench) Enriched in Apigenin-Protected Rats against Aflatoxin B-Associated Hepatorenal Derangement.

Owumi S, Ajakaiye B, Akinwunmi A, Nwozo S, Oyelere A Molecules. 2023; 28(7).

PMID: 37049776 PMC: 10095839. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28073013.


Neuropharmacological Effects in Animal Models and HPLC-Phytochemical Profiling of (L.) Kunth Bark Extracts.

de la Cabeza Fernandez M, Sanchez M, Caceres A, Iglesias I, Gomez-Serranillos M Molecules. 2023; 28(2).

PMID: 36677821 PMC: 9867209. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020764.


An improved Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy combined with partial least squares regression for rapid quantification of total aflatoxins in commercial chicken feeds and food grains.

Salisu B, Anua S, Rosli W, Mazlan N J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2022; 9(3):546-564.

PMID: 36382050 PMC: 9597927. DOI: 10.5455/javar.2022.i624.

References
1.
Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J . Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Crit Care. 2003; 7(6):451-9. PMC: 374386. DOI: 10.1186/cc2401. View

2.
Akinmusire O, El-Yuguda A, Musa J, Oyedele O, Sulyok M, Somorin Y . Mycotoxins in poultry feed and feed ingredients in Nigeria. Mycotoxin Res. 2018; 35(2):149-155. PMC: 6478637. DOI: 10.1007/s12550-018-0337-y. View

3.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

4.
Singh J, Mehta A . Protein-mediated degradation of aflatoxin B by Pseudomonas putida. Braz J Microbiol. 2019; 50(4):1031-1039. PMC: 6863264. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-019-00134-x. View

5.
Sadhasivam S, Britzi M, Zakin V, Kostyukovsky M, Trostanetsky A, Quinn E . Rapid Detection and Identification of Mycotoxigenic Fungi and Mycotoxins in Stored Wheat Grain. Toxins (Basel). 2017; 9(10). PMC: 5666349. DOI: 10.3390/toxins9100302. View