» Articles » PMID: 35103046

Smart Tourism Technologies' Ambidexterity: Balancing Tourist's Worries and Novelty Seeking for Travel Satisfaction

Overview
Journal Inf Syst Front
Date 2022 Feb 1
PMID 35103046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tourists deal with two intrinsic, uncertainty-driven attributes of travel, tourist worries and novelty seeking, that simultaneously affect their transaction and travel experience satisfaction. Rapid technological advances coupled with uncertainties caused by momentous events such as COVID-19 highlight the increasing significance of smart technologies in the tourism industry. This study explores the relationships between novelty and worries and travel satisfaction, as well as examines how tourists enhance their quality of trips with the use of smart tourism technologies. We find the tourists' novelty seeking would enhance the trip experience, leading to overall travel satisfaction. In contrast, tourist worries, particularly in trip planning, would negatively affect tourists' transaction satisfaction, which in turn impacts the overall travel experience satisfaction. As a moderator in its ambidextrous role, smart tourism technologies help tourists to develop a sense of novelty when planning and visiting a destination and mitigate the worries emanated from the uncertainty of transaction made during the pre-trip planning. Insights and implications of such findings are discussed for both theory and practice.

Citing Articles

An investigation of how perceived smart tourism technologies affect tourists' well-being in marine tourism.

Zheng Y, Wu Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0290539.

PMID: 37624780 PMC: 10456169. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290539.


Are you a spontaneous traveler? Effect of sensation seeking on tourist planfulness in the mobile era.

Li Q, Xu H, Hu Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:968548.

PMID: 36033074 PMC: 9400838. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968548.

References
1.
Bradley M, Greenwald M, Petry M, Lang P . Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992; 18(2):379-90. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.379. View

2.
Baron J, Hershey J, Kunreuther H . Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Anal. 2000; 20(4):413-27. DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.204041. View

3.
Lindell M, WHITNEY D . Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001; 86(1):114-21. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114. View

4.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View

5.
Garcia-Milon A, Juaneda-Ayensa E, Olarte-Pascual C, Pelegrin-Borondo J . Towards the smart tourism destination: Key factors in information source use on the tourist shopping journey. Tour Manag Perspect. 2020; 36:100730. PMC: 7402109. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100730. View