» Articles » PMID: 35100738

Plasma Cell-Free DNA Testing of Patients With EGFR Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Droplet Digital PCR Versus Next-Generation Sequencing Compared With Tissue-Based Results

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) on detection of epidermal growth factor receptor () primary activating mutations and p.T790M with results of tissue analysis in patients with mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods: All patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer for which a pathology and a plasma specimen were available upon progression between November 2016 and July 2018 were selected. Concordance, Cohen's κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

Results: Plasma cfDNA and pathology specimens of 36 patients were analyzed. Agreement between ddPCR and NGS was 86% (κ = 0.63) for the primary activating mutation and 94% (κ = 0.89) for the p.T790M detection. Allele ratios were comparable, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.992 and 0.997, respectively. Discrepancies of some degree were found in 15 patients (41.7%). In six patients (16.7%), no mutations were detected in cfDNA. In three patients (8.3%), p.T790M was detected in plasma but not in the pathology specimen, whereas in three other patients (8.3%), p.T790M was demonstrated in the pathology specimen but not in plasma. Concordance of cfDNA and pathology for the primary activating mutation was 69% for ddPCR and 83% for NGS. For the detection of p.T790M, this was 75% (κ = 0.49) for ddPCR as well as for NGS.

Conclusion: Mutual agreement is high between NGS and ddPCR in cfDNA on the level of a specific mutation, with comparable ratio results. Plasma testing of primary activating mutations and p.T790M shows high concordance with pathology results, for NGS as well as for ddPCR, depending on the extent of the panel used. In NGS, more genetic aberrations can be investigated at once.

Citing Articles

Expert consensus on the use of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer with various T790M mutations post-resistance to first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Ma J, Huang L, Han C Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241289648.

PMID: 39434954 PMC: 11492187. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241289648.


Assessing the Sensitivity of Nested PCR Followed by Direct Sequencing on Exosomal DNA for EGFR Mutation Detection in NSCL.

Jahani M, Mashayekhi P, Omrani M, Khosravi A, Ali D, Azad Manjiri S Iran Biomed J. 2024; 28(4):208-15.

PMID: 39289877 PMC: 11444484. DOI: 10.61186/ibj.4289.


Brief Report: Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Plasma EGFR Mutations and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels as a Surrogate Measure.

Saw S, Tan G, Tan W, Tan A, Lai G, Lim D JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024; 4(12):100599.

PMID: 38162173 PMC: 10757021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100599.


Liquid Biopsies for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Screening and Surveillance: What to Measure?.

Eikenboom E, Wilting S, Deger T, Srebniak M, van Veghel-Plandsoen M, Boers R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760576 PMC: 10526371. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184607.


Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma cfDNA and Paired CTCs of NSCLC Patients before and after Osimertinib Therapy Using Crystal Digital PCR.

Ntzifa A, Kotsakis A, Georgoulias V, Lianidou E Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34073111 PMC: 8197887. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112736.