» Articles » PMID: 35099591

Clinical Experience with Venetoclax in Patients with Newly Diagnosed, Relapsed, or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jan 31
PMID 35099591
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible.

Methods And Patients: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC).

Results: After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1-22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2-20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8-24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5-22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10-22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 - 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9-4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8-24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89-22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5-24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8-22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 - 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.

Citing Articles

ONC213: a novel strategy to resensitize resistant AML cells to venetoclax through induction of mitochondrial stress.

Carter J, Su Y, Al-Antary E, Zhao J, Qiao X, Wang G J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025; 44(1):10.

PMID: 39780285 PMC: 11714820. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03267-6.


Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With a Venetoclax Based Regimen.

Rowe M, Babushok D, Carroll M, Carulli A, Frey N, Gill S Eur J Haematol. 2024; 114(4):626-635.

PMID: 39726154 PMC: 11880964. DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14371.


Azacitidine in combination with shortened venetoclax treatment cycles in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Fleischmann M, Jentzsch M, Brioli A, Eisele F, Frietsch J, Eigendorff F Ann Hematol. 2024; 104(1):285-294.

PMID: 39453477 PMC: 11868173. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-06048-5.


Venetoclax-based salvage therapy as a bridge to transplant is feasible and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Unglaub J, Unglaub J, Schlenk R, Middeke J, Middeke J, Krause S Blood Adv. 2024; 9(2):375-385.

PMID: 39293081 PMC: 11787451. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013086.


A systematic review of venetoclax for the treatment of unfit AML patients in real-world: is all that glitters gold?.

Solana-Altabella A, Rodriguez-Veiga R, Martinez-Cuadron D, Montesinos P Ann Hematol. 2024; .

PMID: 39150561 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05891-w.


References
1.
Zhang H, Nakauchi Y, Kohnke T, Stafford M, Bottomly D, Thomas R . Integrated analysis of patient samples identifies biomarkers for venetoclax efficacy and combination strategies in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Cancer. 2020; 1(8):826-839. PMC: 7591155. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0103-x. View

2.
Tenold M, Moskoff B, Benjamin D, Hoeg R, Rosenberg A, Abedi M . Outcomes of Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Venetoclax Plus Hypomethylating Agents at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:649209. PMC: 7991747. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649209. View

3.
Wei A, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, DiNardo C, Novak J, Laribi K . Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 2020; 135(24):2137-2145. PMC: 7290090. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020004856. View

4.
Apel A, Moshe Y, Ofran Y, Gural A, Wolach O, Ganzel C . Venetoclax combinations induce high response rates in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy in routine practice. Am J Hematol. 2021; 96(7):790-795. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26190. View

5.
Zucenka A, Vaitekenaite V, Maneikis K, Davainis L, Pileckyte R, Trociukas I . Venetoclax-based salvage therapy followed by Venetoclax and DLI maintenance vs. FLAG-Ida for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021; 56(11):2804-2812. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01416-5. View