» Articles » PMID: 35096686

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Early Protected Movement and Splinting for Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fracture

Abstract

Background: Fifth metacarpal neck fractures account for 20% of all hand fractures, yet there remains debate with respect to management, particularly when conservative treatment is initiated. The objective of this study is to compare functional and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients treated with early protected movement or splint immobilization.

Methods: This national multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial compared 2 groups; elastic bandage with early protected movement versus immobilization with splinting. Demographic characteristics were collected at baseline. Functional outcomes (grip strength testing) and PROs (Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire [bMHQ]) were collected at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-intervention. Grip strength values of the injured hand were normalized to both the non-injured hand (at baseline), and the Canadian reference values.

Results: Thirty-seven participants from 5 Canadian centers were randomized into the splint (n = 21) or elastic bandage group (n = 16). There were no significant differences in the bMHQ score between the splint (52.1 ± 27.2) or the elastic bandage (46.6 ± 20.4) groups ( = .51). There were no differences in baseline grip strength between the splint (15.3 ± 8.9 kg) and elastic bandage (19.9 ± 7.5 kg) groups. At 8 weeks, the elastic bandage group had a significantly higher grip strength than the splint group (93% vs 64%, respectively: < .05), when standardized as a percentage of the Canadian reference values.

Conclusion: Patients with Boxer's fractures treated with early protected movement had better functional outcomes by 8 weeks post-treatment as compared to the Canadian reference values of those treated with immobilization and splinting. Providers should manage Boxer's fractures with early protected movement.

References
1.
Potenza V, Caterini R, De Maio F, Bisicchia S, Farsetti P . Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone. Medium-term results in 28 cases treated by percutaneous transverse pinning. Injury. 2011; 43(2):242-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.036. View

2.
Boussakri H, Elidrissi M, Azarkane M, Bensaad S, Bachiri M, Shimi M . Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone, treated by percutaneous intramedullary nailing: surgical technique, radiological and clinical results study (28 cases). Pan Afr Med J. 2014; 18:187. PMC: 4237565. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.187.3347. View

3.
Strub B, Schindele S, Sonderegger J, Sproedt J, von Campe A, Gruenert J . Intramedullary splinting or conservative treatment for displaced fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck? A prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010; 35(9):725-9. DOI: 10.1177/1753193410377845. View

4.
Agarwal A, Pickford M . Experience with a new ultralow-profile osteosynthesis system for fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges. Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 57(2):206-12. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000215925.58902.bc. View

5.
Omokawa S, Fujitani R, Dohi Y, Okawa T, Yajima H . Prospective outcomes of comminuted periarticular metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated using a titanium plate system. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33(6):857-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.040. View