» Articles » PMID: 35093975

Assessing Impact: Implementing an Opioid Prescription Protocol in Otolaryngology

Overview
Journal J Patient Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Jan 30
PMID 35093975
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A lack of guidance for pain control after otolaryngology surgery can lead to overprescription of opioids. We implemented a postoperative site-specific opioid prescription protocol and analyzed the impact on opioid prescriptions.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. A postoperative opioid prescription protocol was implemented within our otolaryngology department at a tertiary academic medical center on January 1, 2020. Retrospective chart review was completed for all patients undergoing otolaryngology surgery from November 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020 (2 months before and after initiation of intervention; n = 1070). The primary outcome was change in the amount of opioid prescribed for the preintervention and postintervention cohorts. Unplanned contact related to pain and opioid refills were tracked to assess pain control.

Results: A total of 940 cases were included; adult and pediatric data were analyzed separately. There were 489 pediatric cases, 250 preintervention and 239 postintervention. There was a significant decrease in the amount of opioid prescribed per pediatric patient in the postintervention cohort (2.7 versus 0.32 morphine milligram equivalents, P = 0.02), and 99% of patients were not prescribed opioids at all. There was no significant change in unplanned contact, and no refills were required. There were 451 adult cases, 200 preintervention and 251 postintervention. There was no statistically significant decrease in the amount of opioid prescribed per adult patient (56.8 versus 51.7 morphine milligram equivalents, P = 0.23). There was no significant increase in unplanned contact or refills.

Conclusions: A postoperative opioid prescribing protocol can reduce the amount of opioid prescribed without increasing unplanned contact or opioid refills.

References
1.
Campbell H, Yuhan B, Smith B, Misch E, Svider P, Pashkova A . Perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing otologic surgery: An evidence-based review. Laryngoscope. 2019; 130(1):190-199. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27872. View

2.
Ravesloot M, de Raaff C, van de Beek M, Benoist L, Beyers J, Corso R . Perioperative Care of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Upper Airway Surgery: A Review and Consensus Recommendations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 145(8):751-760. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1448. View

3.
Oltman J, Militsakh O, DAgostino M, Kauffman B, Lindau R, Coughlin A . Multimodal Analgesia in Outpatient Head and Neck Surgery: A Feasibility and Safety Study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143(12):1207-1212. PMC: 5824296. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1773. View

4.
Brummett C, Waljee J, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe M . New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(6):e170504. PMC: 7050825. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. View

5.
Ng T, Diamantaras D, Priestley J, Redman J, de Silva N, Mahanta V . Is celecoxib a useful adjunct in the treatment of post-tonsillectomy pain in the adult population? A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Laryngol Otol. 2017; 131(S1):S18-S28. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215116009476. View