» Articles » PMID: 35093067

Comparison of the Performance of the CareStart Malaria Pf/Pan Combo Test and Field Microscopy in the Diagnosis of Plasmodium Vivax Malaria in North Sumatera, Indonesia

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2022 Jan 30
PMID 35093067
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In areas where malaria is endemic and where trained microscopists are not available, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are needed not only to allow prompt treatment without delay but also to prevent overdiagnosis and overtreatment based on clinical judgements that may lead to drug resistance. This study aimed to compare the performances of the CareStart Pf/Pan Combo test to field microscopy, which is considered to be the gold standard for malaria diagnosis.

Methods: Any person with a fever or a history of fever within 48 h who came to the health centre was recruited for the study and tested both by the CareStart Pf/Pan test and by field microscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were analysed with both methods.

Results: Two-hundred study participants were enrolled: 96 (48%) were found to be positive through microscopy, while 100 (50%) participants were found to be positive through RDT. The RDT produced four false-positive results. High sensitivity and specificity were observed for the CareStart Pf/Pan test (100 and 96.15%, respectively). The CareStart Pf/Pan test also showed excellent agreement with the field microscopy results.

Conclusion: The Carestart Pf/Pan could be used as an alternative diagnostic test in malaria-endemic areas where facility for performing microscopy is not available.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the performance of advantage P.f. malaria Card and advantage malaria Pan + Pf Card, two rapid diagnostic tests for parasitological confirmation of malaria cases in field situation in Togo.

Teou D, Dorkenoo A, Ataba E, Alidou S, Yakpa K, Abdou-Kerim A Parasit Vectors. 2023; 16(1):444.

PMID: 38037186 PMC: 10691072. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-06062-y.


Performance of highly sensitive and conventional rapid diagnostic tests for clinical and subclinical Plasmodium falciparum infections, and hrp2/3 deletion status in Burundi.

Niyukuri D, Sinzinkayo D, Troth E, Oduma C, Barengayabo M, Ndereyimana M PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(7):e0000828.

PMID: 36962426 PMC: 10022336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000828.


Spatial analysis to evaluate risk of malaria in Northern Sumatera, Indonesia.

Fahmi F, Pasaribu A, Theodora M, Wangdi K Malar J. 2022; 21(1):241.

PMID: 35987665 PMC: 9392258. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04262-y.

References
1.
Murray C, Bennett J . [Not Available]. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2009; 2009:415953. PMC: 2696022. DOI: 10.1155/2009/415953. View

2.
Nguyen T, von Seidlein L, Nguyen T, Truong P, Hung S, Pham H . The persistence and oscillations of submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections over time in Vietnam: an open cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 18(5):565-572. PMC: 5910058. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30046-X. View

3.
Kim J, Ji S, Goo Y, Na B, Pyo H, Lee H . Comparison of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of Plasmodium vivax malaria in South Korea. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e64353. PMC: 3646812. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064353. View

4.
Singh N, Shukla M, Shukla M, Mehra R, Sharma S, Bharti P . Field and laboratory comparative evaluation of rapid malaria diagnostic tests versus traditional and molecular techniques in India. Malar J. 2010; 9:191. PMC: 2905433. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-191. View

5.
Wongsrichanalai C, Barcus M, Muth S, Sutamihardja A, Wernsdorfer W . A review of malaria diagnostic tools: microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 77(6 Suppl):119-27. View