» Articles » PMID: 35090086

Risk Indicators of Long-term Outcome of Implant Therapy in Patients with a History of Severe Periodontitis or No History Of periodontitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Int J Dent Hyg
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jan 28
PMID 35090086
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess factors associated with peri-implant disease in partially edentulous patients with a history of severe periodontitis or no history of periodontitis.

Methods: Partially edentulous patients with a history of severe periodontitis/without history of periodontitis who received implant surgery within the past 6 to 8 years were recalled. Clinical and radiographic examinations were recorded. Periodontal probing depth, marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implantitis were considered as the primary outcome and peri-implant bleeding on probing (BOP) was considered as the secondary outcome. The following criteria were considered as the predictors, as well: history of severe periodontitis, gender, age, smoking, brushing frequency, recall interval, full-mouth plaque score, full-mouth bleeding score, splinted prosthesis, open/tight interproximal contact, width of keratinized mucosa, mucosal thickness, implants placed in the grafted bone and implant type. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were utilized.

Results: A total of 88 patients (186 implants) fulfilled the study. Forty-seven patients (108 implants) had a history of severe periodontitis and 41 patients (78 implants) had no history of periodontitis. There was a higher chance of peri-implantitis in patients with a history of severe periodontitis (OR = 11.13; p = 0.045), implants with lack of peri-implant KM (<2 mm) and implants placed in the grafted bone (OR = 14.94, p < 0.001; OR = 4.93, p = 0.047). The risk of peri-implant MBL ≥3 mm was higher in patients with greater FMBS (OR = 1.20; p < 0.001). The chance of peri-implant BOP was independently higher in patients who brushed their teeth at most once per day (OR = 3.20; p = 0.04), higher FMBS (OR = 1.16; p < 0.001) and irregular recall visits (OR = 15.34; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Partially edentulous patients with the history of severe periodontitis, lack of peri-implant KM and implants placed in bone-grafted sites expressed higher probability of peri-implantitis. In addition, inadequate frequency of brushing (at most once daily) and irregular recall visits were associated with greater chance of peri-implant BOP.

Citing Articles

Risk factors and prediction model of peri-implantitis in post operative periodontitis patients.

Gao X, Li D, Duan Y, Wu L Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(9):4741-4750.

PMID: 39398596 PMC: 11470293. DOI: 10.62347/THTL1156.


A Cross-Sectional Study of Peri-Implant Diseases in a Random Norwegian Population: Prevalence, Risk Indicators, and Clinical Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Mauland E, Sorensen K, Aarbu N, Verket A, Ellingsen S, Bull V Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 36(2):153-165.

PMID: 39381842 PMC: 11810557. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14371.


Maintenance of peri-implant health in general dental practice.

Perussolo J, Donos N Br Dent J. 2024; 236(10):781-789.

PMID: 38789755 PMC: 11126374. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-024-7406-8.


Investigation of peri-implant diseases prevalence and related risk indicators in patients with treated severe periodontitis over 4 years after restoration.

Lv P, Zhong J, Ouyang X, Iao S, Liu J, Xie Y J Dent Sci. 2024; 19(2):894-899.

PMID: 38618128 PMC: 11010623. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.08.010.


Comparison of Photothermal and Photodynamic Diode Laser Therapy in Patients with Peri-implant Mucositis: A Systematic Review.

Sanchez-Martos R, Kronkah N, Arias-Herrera S J Clin Exp Dent. 2023; 15(9):e760-e772.

PMID: 37799758 PMC: 10550071. DOI: 10.4317/jced.60711.