» Articles » PMID: 35087147

Innovative Composite Tool Use by Goffin's Cockatoos (Cacatua Goffiniana)

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jan 28
PMID 35087147
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Composite tool use (using more than one tool simultaneously to achieve an end) has played a significant role in the development of human technology. Typically, it depends on a number of specific and often complex spatial relations and there are thus very few reported cases in non-human animals (e.g., specific nut-cracking techniques in chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys). The innovative strategies underlying the innovation and spread of tool manufacture and associative tool use (using > 1 tools) across tool using animals is an important milestone towards a better understanding of the evolution of human technology. We tested Goffin's cockatoos on a composite tool problem, the 'Golf Club Task', that requires the use of two objects in combination (one used to control the free movement of a second) to get a reward. We demonstrate that these parrots can innovate composite tool use by actively controlling the position of the end effector and movement of both objects involved in a goal directed manner. The consistent use of different techniques by different subjects highlights the innovative nature of the individual solutions. To test whether the solution could be socially transmitted, we conducted a second study, which provided only tentative evidence for emulative learning. To our knowledge, this indicates that the cognitive preconditions for composite tool use have also evolved outside the primate lineage.

Citing Articles

Goffin's cockatoos use object mass but not balance cues when making object transport decisions.

Adelmant C, Osuna-Mascaro A, Folkertsma R, Auersperg A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27265.

PMID: 39562587 PMC: 11576884. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76104-7.


Mechanical Problem Solving in Goffin's Cockatoos-Towards Modeling Complex Behavior.

Baum M, Rossler T, Osuna-Mascaro A, Auersperg A, Brock O Adapt Behav. 2024; 32(6):551-562.

PMID: 39430575 PMC: 11486547. DOI: 10.1177/10597123241270764.


Children's limited tooling ability in a novel concurrent tool use task supports the innovation gap.

Colbourne J, Auersperg A, Beck S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21374.

PMID: 39266618 PMC: 11393408. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71686-8.


How bipedalism shapes humans' actions with hand tools.

Fragaszy D, Kelty-Stephen D, Mangalam M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1911):20230152.

PMID: 39155723 PMC: 11391300. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0152.


Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) manufacture objects relative to a mental template.

Smirnova A, Bulgakova L, Cheplakova M, Jelbert S Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):36.

PMID: 38683398 PMC: 11058793. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01874-6.


References
1.
Laumer I, Bugnyar T, Auersperg A . Flexible decision-making relative to reward quality and tool functionality in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana). Sci Rep. 2016; 6:28380. PMC: 4917853. DOI: 10.1038/srep28380. View

2.
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H . Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011; 65(1):47-55. PMC: 3015194. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5. View

3.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View

4.
Cutting N, Apperly I, Chappell J, Beck S . The puzzling difficulty of tool innovation: why can't children piece their knowledge together?. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014; 125:110-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.010. View

5.
Ebel S, Volter C, Call J . Prior experience mediates the usage of food items as tools in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo abelii). J Comp Psychol. 2020; 135(1):64-73. DOI: 10.1037/com0000236. View