» Articles » PMID: 35087100

No Evidence That Mask-wearing in Public Places Elicits Risk Compensation Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jan 28
PMID 35087100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Face masks have been widely employed as a personal protective measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, concerns remain that masks create a false sense of security that reduces adherence to other public health measures, including social distancing. This paper tested whether mask-wearing was negatively associated with social distancing compliance. In two studies, we combined video-observational records of public mask-wearing in two Dutch cities with a natural-experimental approach to evaluate the effect of an area-based mask mandate. We found no observational evidence of an association between mask-wearing and social distancing but found a positive link between crowding and social distancing violations. Our natural-experimental analysis showed that an area-based mask mandate did not significantly affect social distancing or crowding levels. Our results alleviate the concern that mask use reduces social distancing compliance or increases crowding levels. On the other hand, crowding reduction may be a viable strategy to mitigate social distancing violations.

Citing Articles

Outdoor social distancing behaviors changed during a pandemic: A longitudinal analysis using street view imagery.

Martell M, Salazar C, Errett N, Miles S, Wartman J, Choe J PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315132.

PMID: 39637074 PMC: 11620612. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315132.


Effect of face-covering use on adherence to other COVID-19 protective behaviours: A systematic review.

Millest A, Saeed S, Symons C, Carter H PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0284629.

PMID: 38603671 PMC: 11008824. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284629.


Cross-Theoretical Compliance: An Integrative Compliance Analysis of COVID-19 Mitigation Responses in Israel.

de Bruijn A, Feldman Y, Reinders Folmer C, Kuiper M, Brownlee M, Kooistra E Adm Soc. 2024; 55(4):635-670.

PMID: 38603342 PMC: 9790859. DOI: 10.1177/00953997221140899.


Airborne SARS-CoV2 virus exposure, interpersonal distance, face mask and perceived risk of infection.

Svenson O, Isohanni F, Salo I, Lindholm T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2285.

PMID: 38280918 PMC: 10821858. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52711-2.


People interact closer when a face mask is worn but risk compensation is at best partial.

Aranguren M, Cartaud A, Cisse I, Coello Y Eur J Public Health. 2023; 33(6):1177-1182.

PMID: 37717267 PMC: 10710335. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad161.


References
1.
Bulfone T, Malekinejad M, Rutherford G, Razani N . Outdoor Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review. J Infect Dis. 2020; 223(4):550-561. PMC: 7798940. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa742. View

2.
Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S . Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66(12):1182-6. PMC: 3796763. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. View

3.
Martin G, Hanna E, Dingwall R . Urgency and uncertainty: covid-19, face masks, and evidence informed policy. BMJ. 2020; 369:m2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2017. View

4.
Gwet K . Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008; 61(Pt 1):29-48. DOI: 10.1348/000711006X126600. View

5.
Yan Y, Bayham J, Richter A, Fenichel E . Risk compensation and face mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3174. PMC: 7862259. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82574-w. View